Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17483480›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2007

Intracellular targeting of telomeric retrotransposon Gag proteins of distantly related Drosophila species.

Elena Casacuberta, Fernando Azorín Marín, Mary-Lou Pardue

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Evolution of diverse mechanisms for protecting chromosome ends by Drosophila TART telomere retrotransposons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena CasacubertaInstitute of Molecular Biology of Barcelona, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas and Institute for Research on Biomedicine of Barcelona (IRB), 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Fernando Azorín Marín
Mary-Lou Pardue
Institute for Research in Biomedicine · ESMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

HET-A, A RETROPOSON WITH A ROLE IN CHROMOSOME STRUCTURER01GM050315 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PARDUE, MARY-LOU · 1995 to 2006
$2.3M
An Evolutionary Link Between Telomeres and TransposonsR56GM050315 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PARDUE, MARY-LOU · 2008 to 2008
$399k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM50315NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM050315NIGMS NIH HHS R56 GM050315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The retrotransposons that maintain telomeres in Drosophila melanogaster have unique features that are shared across all Drosophila species but are not found in other retrotransposons. Comparative analysis of these features provides insight into their importance for telomere maintenance in Drosophila. Gag proteins encoded by HeT-A(mel) and TART(mel) are efficiently and cooperatively targeted to telomeres in interphase nuclei, a behavior that may facilitate telomere-specific transposition. Drosophila virilis, separated from D. melanogaster by 60 MY, has telomeres maintained by HeT-A(vir) and TART(vir). The Gag proteins from HeT-A(mel) and HeT-A(vir) have only 16% amino acid identity, yet several of their functional features are conserved. Using transient transfection of cultured cells from both species, we show that the telomere association of HeT-A(vir) Gag is indistinguishable from that of HeT-A(mel) Gag. Deletion derivatives show that organization of localization signals within the two proteins is strikingly similar. Gag proteins of TART(mel) and TART(vir) are only 13% identical. In contrast to HeT-A, surprisingly, TART(vir) Gag does not localize to the nucleus, although TART(vir) is a major component of D. virilis telomeres, and localization signals in the protein have much the same organization as in TART(mel) Gag. Thus, the mechanism of telomere targeting of TART(vir) differs, at least in a minor way, from that of TART(mel). Our findings suggest that, despite dramatic rates of protein evolution, protein and cellular determinants that correctly localize these Gag proteins have been conserved throughout the 60 MY separating these species.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineCell NucleusConserved SequenceCytoplasmic StructuresDrosophilaGene Products, gagProtein BindingProtein TransportRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRetroelementsSequence DeletionSequence Homology, Amino AcidTelomereGene Products, gagRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID17483480
PMCPMC1895960
OpenAlexW2012703680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.