Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17482725›Full record

ArticleVaccine2007

Evaluation of combinatorial vaccines against anthrax and plague in a murine model.

Amanda B DuBois, Lucy C Freytag, John D Clements

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda B DuBoisDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Lucy C Freytag
John D Clements
Tulane University · US

Funding

Combinatorial vaccines against anthrax and plagueR21AI055013 · NIAID · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI CLEMENTS, JOHN D · 2003 to 2006
$681k
NIAID NIH HHS AI055013NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI055013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we examine the potential of a combinatorial vaccine consisting of the lead-candidate antigens for the next generations of vaccines against anthrax (rPA) and plague (F1-V) with the specific objective of determining synergy or interference between the vaccine components when they are administered separately or together by both traditional parenteral immunization (SC) and mucosal immunization (IN) in the presence of appropriate adjuvants. The most significant findings of the study reported here are that (1) a combinatorial vaccine consisting of equal amounts of F1-V and rPA administered SC is effective at eliciting a robust serum and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) antigen-specific IgG and IgG1 response against both antigens in immunized animals, and when administered IN, a robust antigen-specific IgG2a response in the serum and BAL is also induced; (2) there were few instances where either synergy or interference was observed in the combined vaccine administered by either route and those differences occurred soon after the final immunization and were not sustained over time; (3) IN immunization was as effective as SC immunization for induction of antigen-specific serum and BAL antibody responses using the same amount of antigen; (4) the IgG1/IgG2a ratios suggest a strongly biased Type 2 response following SC immunization, while IN immunization produced a more balanced Type 1/Type 2 response; (5) the IgG1/IgG2a ratio was influenced by the route of immunization, the adjuvant employed, and the nature of the antigen. As with previously published studies, there were still detectable levels of circulating anti-F1-V and anti-rPA even 6 months post-primary immunization. These studies provide important insights into the development of new generation biodefense vaccines.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, IntranasalAnimalsAnthrax VaccinesAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidDisease Models, AnimalFemaleImmunoglobulin GInjections, SubcutaneousMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPlague VaccineAdjuvants, Immunologicanthrax toxinAnthrax VaccinesAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBacterial Toxinscaf1 protein, Yersinia pestisImmunoglobulin GLcrV protein, YersiniaPlague VaccinePore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsVaccines, Combined

Identifiers

PMID17482725
PMCPMC1929014
OpenAlexW2085053341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.