Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17480025›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of comparative neurology2007

Chemotopic odorant coding in a mammalian olfactory system.

Brett A Johnson, Michael Leon

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 284 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Odor encoding by signals in the olfactory bulb.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biological constraints on configural odour mixture perception.The Journal of experimental biology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dynamic Impairment of Olfactory Behavior and Signaling Mediated by an Olfactory Corticofugal System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brett A JohnsonDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-4550, USA. bajohnso@uci.edu
Michael Leon
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

NEURAL PROCESSES IN OLFACTORY CODINGR01DC003545 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LEON, MICHAEL · 1998 to 2007
$2.8M
Models of Sensory CodingR01DC006391 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LEON, MICHAEL · 2004 to 2008
$1.3M
Neuroinformatic Analysis of Olfactory CodingR01DC006516 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LEON, MICHAEL · 2004 to 2006
$783k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC006391NIDCD NIH HHS DC006516NIDCD NIH HHS DC03545NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003545NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006391NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systematic mapping studies involving 365 odorant chemicals have shown that glomerular responses in the rat olfactory bulb are organized spatially in patterns that are related to the chemistry of the odorant stimuli. This organization involves the spatial clustering of principal responses to numerous odorants that share key aspects of chemistry such as functional groups, hydrocarbon structural elements, and/or overall molecular properties related to water solubility. In several of the clusters, responses shift progressively in position according to odorant carbon chain length. These response domains appear to be constructed from orderly projections of sensory neurons in the olfactory epithelium and may also involve chromatography across the nasal mucosa. The spatial clustering of glomerular responses may serve to "tune" the principal responses of bulbar projection neurons by way of inhibitory interneuronal networks, allowing the projection neurons to respond to a narrower range of stimuli than their associated sensory neurons. When glomerular activity patterns are viewed relative to the overall level of glomerular activation, the patterns accurately predict the perception of odor quality, thereby supporting the notion that spatial patterns of activity are the key factors underlying that aspect of the olfactory code. A critical analysis suggests that alternative coding mechanisms for odor quality, such as those based on temporal patterns of responses, enjoy little experimental support.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAnimalsMammalsMolecular ConformationNeurons, AfferentOdorantsOlfactory BulbOlfactory MucosaOlfactory PathwaysRatsReceptors, OdorantSmellSpace PerceptionStructure-Activity RelationshipReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID17480025
PMCPMC2213457
OpenAlexW2006439735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.