Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17479533›Full record

ArticleOntogenez

[Enhanced control of proliferation in telomerized cells].

E E Egorov, M V Moldaver, Kh S Vishniakova, S M Terekhov, E B Dashinimaev, I B Cheglakov, I Iu Toropygin, K N Iarygin, P M Chumakov, L I Korochkin and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ontogenez. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

E E Egorov
M V Moldaver
Kh S Vishniakova
S M Terekhov
E B Dashinimaev
I B Cheglakov
I Iu Toropygin
K N Iarygin
P M Chumakov
L I Korochkin
G A Antonova
E Iu Rybalkina
I N Saburina
N S Burnaevskiĭ
A V Zelenin

Funding

Potentials of reactivated mutant p53R01CA104903 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI CHUMAKOV, PETER M · 2004 to 2008
$1.5M
Role of sestrin family genes in antioxidant defenseR01AG025278 · NIA · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI CHUMAKOV, PETER M · 2005 to 2009
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA104903NIA NIH HHS R01 AG025278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clones of telomerized fibroblasts of adult human skin have earlier been obtained. It was shown that despite their fast growth in mass cultures, these cells poorly form colonies. Conditioned medium, antioxidants, and reduced partial oxygen pressure enhanced their colony formation, but not to the level characteristic of the initial cells. The conditioned medium of telomerized cells enhanced colony formation to a much greater extent than that of the initial cells. A study of proteome of the telomerized fibroblasts has revealed changes in the activities of tens of genes. A general trend consists in weakening and increased lability of the cytoskeleton and in activation of the mechanisms controlling protein degradation. However, these changes are not very pronounced. During the formation of immortal telomerized cells, selection takes place, which appears to determine changes in the expression of some genes. It was proposed that a decrease in the capacity of telomerized cells for colony formation is due to increased requirements of these cells to cell-cell contacts. The rate of cell growth reached that characteristic of mass cultures only in the largest colonies. In this respect, the telomerized fibroblasts resembled stem cells: they are capable of self-maintenance, but "escape" to differentiation in the absence of the corresponding microenvironment (niche), which is represented by other fibroblasts. Non-dividing cells in the test of colony formation should be regarded as differentiated cells, since they have no features of degradation, preserve their viability, actively move, grow, phagocytized debris, etc. It was also shown that telomerization did not prevent differentiation of myoblasts and human neural stem cells. Thus, the results obtained suggest the existence of normal mechanisms underlying the regulation of proliferation in the telomerized cells, which opens possibilities of their use in cell therapy, especially in the case of autotransplantation to senior people, when the cell proliferative potential is markedly reduced and accessibility of stem cells is significantly restricted.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAdultCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCellular SenescenceChromosomes, Human, Pair 21Colony-Forming Units AssayCulture Media, ConditionedCytoskeletal ProteinsElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalFibroblastsHumansMuscle Fibers, SkeletalNeuronsOxidative StressStem CellsCulture Media, ConditionedCytoskeletal ProteinsTelomerase

Identifiers

PMID17479533
PMCPMC2743981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.