Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17476768›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2007

A new time-scale for ray-finned fish evolution.

Imogen A Hurley, Rachel Lockridge Mueller, Katherine A Dunn, Eric J Schmidt, Matt Friedman, Robert K Ho, Victoria E Prince, Ziheng Yang, Mark G Thomas, Michael I Coates

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 361 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genomic Distortion of Jawed Vertebrate Phylogeny.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genomic Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Imogen A HurleyDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Rachel Lockridge Mueller
Katherine A Dunn
Eric J Schmidt
Matt Friedman
Robert K Ho
Victoria E Prince
Ziheng Yang
Mark G Thomas
Michael I Coates
University of Chicago · USUniversity College London · GBDalhousie University · CA

Funding

MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARDIAC SCIENCEST32HL007381 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI JEANNE M DECARA, Yoav Gilad · 1985 to 2026
$12.5M
Segmentation Defects in Vertebrate Paraxial MesodermR01GM067714 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HO, ROBERT K · 2002 to 2011
$2.5M
Specification of blood lineages in a vertebrate embryoR01DK068286 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HO, ROBERT K · 2004 to 2008
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007381NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK068286NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067714NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM67714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Actinopterygii (ray-finned fishes) is the largest and most diverse vertebrate group, but little is agreed about the timing of its early evolution. Estimates using mitochondrial genomic data suggest that the major actinopterygian clades are much older than divergence dates implied by fossils. Here, the timing of the evolutionary origins of these clades is reinvestigated using morphological, and nuclear and mitochondrial genetic data. Results indicate that existing fossil-based estimates of the age of the crown-group Neopterygii, including the teleosts, Lepisosteus (gar) and Amia (bowfin), are at least 40 Myr too young. We present new palaeontological evidence that the neopterygian crown radiation is a Palaeozoic event, and demonstrate that conflicts between molecular and morphological data for the age of the Neopterygii result, in part, from missing fossil data. Although our molecular data also provide an older age estimate for the teleost crown, this range extension remains unsupported by the fossil evidence. Nuclear data from all relevant clades are used to demonstrate that the actinopterygian whole-genome duplication event is teleost-specific. While the date estimate of this event overlaps the probable range of the teleost stem group, a correlation between the genome duplication and the large-scale pattern of actinopterygian phylogeny remains elusive.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsBayes TheoremDNA, MitochondrialFishesFossilsGenomePhylogenyTime FactorsDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID17476768
PMCPMC1766393
OpenAlexW1980001465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.