Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17476541›Full record

ReviewJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2007

Molecular approaches: advantages and artifacts in assessing bacterial diversity.

Daniela Santos Pontes, Cláudia Iracema Lima-Bittencourt, Edmar Chartone-Souza, Andréa Maria Amaral Nascimento

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identification and Classification for theFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  5. Review
  6. A novel rat model of catheter-associated urinary tract infection.International urology and nephrology · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Archaeal diversity in a Fe-As rich acid mine drainage at Carnoulès (France).Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2008
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Microbial diversity and genomics in aid of bioenergy.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniela Santos PontesDepartamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627 Belo Horizonte, CEP 31.270-901, MG, Brazil.
Cláudia Iracema Lima-Bittencourt
Edmar Chartone-Souza
Andréa Maria Amaral Nascimento

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria account for a major proportion of Earth's biological diversity. They play essential roles in quite diverse environments and there has been an increasing interest in bacterial biodiversity. Research using novel and efficient tools to identify and characterize bacterial communities has been the key for elucidating biological activities with potential for industrial application. The current approach used for defining bacterial species is based on phenotypic and genomic properties. Traditional and novel DNA-based molecular methods are improving our knowledge of bacterial diversity in nature. Advances in molecular biology have been important for studies of diversity, considerably improving our knowledge of morphological, physiological, and ecological features of bacterial taxa. DNA-DNA hybridization, which has been used for many years, is still considered the golden standard for bacteria species identification. PCR-based methods investigating 16S rRNA gene sequences, and other approaches, such as the metagenome, have been used to study the physiology and diversity of bacteria and to identify novel genes with potential pharmaceutical and other biotechnological applications. We examined the advantages and limitations of molecular methods currently used to analyze bacterial diversity; these are mainly based on the 16S rRNA gene. These methods have allowed us to examine microorganisms that cannot be cultivated by routine methods and have also been useful for phylogenetic studies. We also considered the importance of improvements in microbe culture techniques and how we can combine different methods to allow a more appropriate assessment of bacterial diversity and to determine their real potential for industrial applications.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacteriological TechniquesBiodiversityDNA, BacterialGenetic VariationPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.