Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17475683›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted infections2007

How much do delayed healthcare seeking, delayed care provision, and diversion from primary care contribute to the transmission of STIs?

Catherine H Mercer, Lorna Sutcliffe, Anne M Johnson, Peter J White, Gary Brook, Jonathan D C Ross, Jyoti Dhar, Paddy Horner, Frances Keane, Eva Jungmann and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. WORKING AT THE TOP OF THEIR CAPABILITIES: HOW TEAMWORK SUPPORT ATTENUATES LEADER ROLE CONFLICT.Group dynamics : theory, research, and practice : the official journal of Division 49, Group Psychology and Group Psychotherapy of the American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Catherine H MercerCentre for Sexual Health and HIV Research, University College London, Mortimer Market Centre, London, UK. cmercer@gum.ucl.ac.uk
Lorna Sutcliffe
Anne M Johnson
Peter J White
Gary Brook
Jonathan D C Ross
Jyoti Dhar
Paddy Horner
Frances Keane
Eva Jungmann
John Sweeney
George Kinghorn
Geoff G Garnett
Judith M Stephenson
Jackie A Cassell

Funding

Medical Research Council G0100063Medical Research Council G0200565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo quantify the contribution of patient delay, provider delay, and diversion between services to delayed access to genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics. To describe the factors associated with delay, and their contribution to STI transmission.

methodsCross-sectional survey of 3184 consecutive new patients attending four GUM clinics purposively selected from across England to represent different types of population. Patients completed a short written questionnaire that collected data on sociodemographics, access, and health-seeking behaviour. Questionnaires were then linked to routinely collected individual-level demographic and diagnostic data.

resultsPatient delay is a median of 7 days, and does not vary by demographic or social characteristics, or by clinic. However, attendance at a walk-in appointment was associated with a marked reduction in patient delay and provider delay. Among symptomatics, 44.8% of men and 58.0% of women continued to have sex while awaiting treatment, with 7.0% reporting sex with >1 partner; 4.2% of symptomatic patients reported sex without using condoms with new partner(s) since their symptoms had begun. Approximately 25% of all patients had already sought or received care in general practice, and these patients experienced greater provider delay.

conclusionsWalk-in services are associated with a reduction in patient and provider delay, and should be available to all populations. Patients attending primary care require clear care pathways when referred on to GUM clinics. Health promotion should encourage symptomatic patients to seek care quickly, and to avoid sexual contact before treatment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAmbulatory CareCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareEnglandFamily PracticeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareRisk FactorsSexually Transmitted Diseases

Identifiers

PMID17475683
PMCPMC2659040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.