Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17473965›Full record

ReviewJournal of genetic counseling2007

Inherited thrombophilia: key points for genetic counseling.

Elizabeth Varga

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of genetic counseling, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A semiquantitative metric for evaluating clinical actionability of incidental or secondary findings from genome-scale sequencing.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
    Article
  4. Genetic counseling for inherited thrombophilias.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elizabeth VargaDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. vargae@pediatrics.ohio-state.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the evolution of medical genetics to focus on highly prevalent, multifactorial conditions, it is inevitable that genetic counselors will be called upon to participate in the evaluation and counseling of individuals with inherited thrombophilia. The purpose of this review is to educate the genetic counselor on key issues related to risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary thrombophilia. The information contained in this document is derived from an extensive review of the literature, as well as the author's personal expertise. Upon completion of this review, the genetic counselor will be able to: a) describe inherited and acquired risk factors for thrombosis, b) collect and interpret personal and family histories to assess risk related to hereditary thrombophilia, c) discuss the potential advantages and disadvantages of thrombophilia testing, including psychosocial aspects and implications for medical management, and d) identify educational and support resources for patients and families.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingAbortion, HabitualAntithrombin III DeficiencyFactor VFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHomocysteineHumansMaleMethylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)Polymorphism, GeneticPregnancyProthrombinReferral and ConsultationRisk AssessmentFactor Vfactor V LeidenHomocysteineMethylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)Prothrombin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.