Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17472737›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2007

Maturation of the mammalian secretome.

Jeremy C Simpson, Alvaro Mateos, Rainer Pepperkok

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. FunSecKB: the Fungal Secretome KnowledgeBase.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeremy C SimpsonCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany. simpson@embl.de
Alvaro Mateos
Rainer Pepperkok
European Bioinformatics Institute · GBEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent use of quantitative proteomics to determine the constituents of the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi complex is discussed in the light of other available methodologies for cataloging the proteins associated with the mammalian secretory pathway.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell FractionationEndoplasmic ReticulumGolgi ApparatusLiverMass SpectrometryMembrane ProteinsProtein TransportProteomicsRatsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17472737
PMCPMC1895991
OpenAlexW2140158320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.