SynthesisDrug safety2007
An evaluation of the cardiovascular safety profile of duloxetine: findings from 42 placebo-controlled studies.
Synthesis in Drug safety, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.
- Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- The cost effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for generalized anxiety disorder.PharmacoEconomics · 2013Pooled it
- The general and comparative efficacy and safety of duloxetine in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Drug safety · 2009Pooled it
- Duloxetine for painful diabetic neuropathy and fibromyalgia pain: systematic review of randomised trials.BMC neurology · 2008Pooled it
- Maintenance of effect of duloxetine in Chinese patients with pain due to osteoarthritis: 13-week open-label extension data.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2019Trial
- Mental Disorders as Risk Factors for New Onset Cardiovascular Diseases.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Association of Pregabalin vs. Duloxetine with Cardiovascular Events: A Retrospective Cohort Study Among US Veterans With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Serotonin Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor Is Associated With Lower Mortality Among Patients Presenting With Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Comparative Cardiovascular Safety of Duloxetine and Gabapentin in Patients with Hip Osteoarthritis.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- The Long-Term Cardiovascular Risks of Duloxetine Use in Older Adults: A Retrospective Medical Record-Based Adverse Drug Reaction Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Duloxetine for Postoperative Pain Control Following Knee or Hip Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Arthroplasty today · 2023Article
- Off-Target Effects of Antidepressants on Vascular Function and Structure.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- The Cardiovascular Effects of Newer Antidepressants in Older Adults and Those With or At High Risk for Cardiovascular Diseases.CNS drugs · 2020Review
- Multiple adverse drug reactions and genetic polymorphism testing: A case report with negative result.Medicine · 2017Article
- Depression, Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Psychosocial Health.Sleep medicine and disorders : international journal · 2017Article
- Antidepressants and cardiovascular adverse events: A narrative review.ARYA atherosclerosis · 2015Review
- [Treatment of depression in coronary heart disease].Der Nervenarzt · 2015Article
- A review of the suitability of duloxetine and venlafaxine for use in patients with depression in primary care with a focus on cardiovascular safety, suicide and mortality due to antidepressant overdose.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2013Article
- Observational study on safety and tolerability of duloxetine in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence in German routine practice.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013Article
- The noradrenergic action in antidepressant treatments: pharmacological and clinical aspects.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveIn recent years, new classes of medication, such as the serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), have been developed for use in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). For many years, treatment options were largely limited to the use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). However, there have been published reports of orthostatic hypotension, arrhythmias and corrected QT (QTc) interval changes in patients treated with TCAs. As new medications become available, it is important to understand how their cardiovascular safety profile compares with that of more established agents to aid clinicians and patients in choosing the best treatment options. This study was designed to evaluate the cardiovascular safety profile of the SNRI duloxetine through evaluation of cardiovascular-related parameters and adverse events (AEs).
methodsThe cardiovascular safety of duloxetine was assessed using all placebo-controlled duloxetine clinical trial data as of December 2005. This consisted of data from 42 placebo-controlled clinical trials of 8504 patients who were treated with duloxetine. Additional information from a high-dose clinical pharmacology study and postmarketing safety surveillance are also presented. Of the placebo-controlled trials included in this analysis, clinical indications under investigation included MDD (15 studies), diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (3 studies), fibromyalgia (2 studies), generalised anxiety disorder (3 studies) and lower urinary tract disorders (19 studies, all related to incontinence). Cardiovascular safety was evaluated based on vital signs, ECGs and the incidence of treatment-emergent AEs potentially related to cardiovascular safety. These safety parameters were analysed across all indications. To identify both serious and non-serious cardiovascular-related AEs, as well as AEs reported as the reason for discontinuation, a comprehensive list of terms derived from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (version 8.0) was generated and used to search the duloxetine databases for cardiovascular-related events.
resultsCalculation of change from baseline to maximum in ECG parameters showed significant differences between treatment groups for all parameters, with decreases from baseline in RR, QRS and QT intervals for patients receiving duloxetine and increases from baseline for patients treated with placebo. These shifts were related to small heart rate changes, but the mean differences were not considered clinically relevant. Categorical analyses of shifts from normal to abnormal (or abnormal to normal) for heart rate and QT corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) values showed that most patients did not shift from their baseline category. Patients with MDD who were treated for up to 1 year with duloxetine had blood pressure changes early in treatment that then stabilised. Even in patients with elevated blood pressure at baseline in these clinical trials, no increased risk of sustained blood pressure elevation with duloxetine treatment was found.
conclusionOverall, the findings presented here support our conclusions that use of duloxetine does not appear to be associated with significant cardiovascular risks in patients with conditions for which the drug has been approved or studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.