Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17471183›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2007

Tricyclic antidepressant pharmacology and therapeutic drug interactions updated.

P K Gillman

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 237 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
237citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

237 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 670 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Drug-drug interactions involving classic psychedelics: A systematic review.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Guideline
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. A prospective, open-label study of milnacipran in the prevention of headache in patients with episodic or chronic migraine.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2014
    Trial
  13. Article
  14. Toxidromes.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

177 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

P K GillmanPsychoTropical Research, Bucasia, Queensland, Australia. kg@matilda.net.au
Speech Pathology Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New data on the pharmacology of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), their affinities for human cloned CNS receptors and their cytochrome P450 enzyme inhibition profiles, allow improved deductions concerning their effects and interactions and indicate which of the TCAs are the most useful. The relative toxicity of TCAs continues to be more precisely defined, as do TCA interactions with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). TCA interactions with monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) have been, historically, an uncertain and difficult question, but are now well understood, although this is not reflected in the literature. The data indicate that nortriptyline and desipramine have the most pharmacologically desirable characteristics as noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (NRIs), and as drugs with few interactions that are also safe when coadministered with either MAOIs or SSRIs. Clomipramine is the only available antidepressant drug that has good evidence of clinically relevant serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibition (SNRI). These data assist drug selection for monotherapy and combination therapy and predict reliably how and why pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions occur. In comparison, two newer drugs proposed to have SNRI properties, duloxetine and venlafaxine, may have insufficient NRI potency to be effective SNRIs. Combinations such as sertraline and nortriptyline may therefore offer advantages over drugs like venlafaxine that have fixed ratios of SRI/NRI effects that are not ideal. However, no TCA/SSRI combination is sufficiently safe to be universally applicable without expert knowledge. Standard texts (e.g. the British National Formulary) and treatment guidelines would benefit by taking account of these new data and understandings.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsAnimalsAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicCentral Nervous SystemCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansMonoamine Oxidase InhibitorsPractice Guidelines as TopicSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemMonoamine Oxidase InhibitorsSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID17471183
PMCPMC2014120
OpenAlexW2155964805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.