Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17471181›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2007

Influence of biophase distribution and P-glycoprotein interaction on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of the effects of morphine on the EEG.

D Groenendaal, J Freijer, D de Mik, M R Bouw, M Danhof, E C M de Lange

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Understanding the hysteresis loop conundrum in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2014
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

D GroenendaalDivision of Pharmacology, Leiden Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Freijer
D de Mik
M R Bouw
M Danhof
E C M de Lange
Centre for Human Drug Research · NLGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBLeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe aim was to investigate the influence of biophase distribution including P-glycoprotein (Pgp) function on the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic correlations of morphine's actions in rat brain. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Male rats received a 10-min infusion of morphine as 4 mg kg(-1), combined with a continuous infusion of the Pgp inhibitor GF120918 or vehicle, 10 or 40 mg kg(-1). EEG signals were recorded continuously and blood samples were collected. KEY

resultsProfound hysteresis was observed between morphine blood concentrations and effects on the EEG. Only the termination of the EEG effect was influenced by GF120918. Biophase distribution was best described with an extended catenary biophase distribution model, with a sequential transfer and effect compartment. The rate constant for transport through the transfer compartment (k(1e)) was 0.038 min(-1), being unaffected by GF120918. In contrast, the rate constant for the loss from the effect compartment (k(eo)) decreased 60% after GF120918. The EEG effect was directly related to concentrations in the effect compartment using the sigmoidal E(max) model. The values of the pharmacodynamic parameters E(0), E(max), EC(50) and Hill factor were 45.0 microV, 44.5 microV, 451 ng ml(-1) and 2.3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The effects of GF120918 on the distribution kinetics of morphine in the effect compartment were consistent with the distribution in brain extracellular fluid (ECF) as estimated by intracerebral microdialysis. However, the time-course of morphine concentrations at the site of action in the brain, as deduced from the biophase model, is distinctly different from the brain ECF concentrations.

Indexed as

AcridinesAlgorithmsAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1ElectroencephalographyExtracellular FluidMicrodialysisModels, StatisticalMorphineRatsTetrahydroisoquinolinesTissue DistributionAcridinesAnalgesics, OpioidATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1ElacridarMorphineTetrahydroisoquinolines

Identifiers

PMID17471181
PMCPMC2013992
OpenAlexW2022217072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.