Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17470479›Full record

ArticleGut2007

Survival in refractory coeliac disease and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma: retrospective evaluation of single-centre experience.

A Al-Toma, W H M Verbeek, M Hadithi, B M E von Blomberg, C J J Mulder

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 330 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2013
    Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Significance of the Microenvironment in T/Nk-Cell Neoplasms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Liver Involvement in Celiac Disease and Immune-Mediated Diseases of the Small Bowel.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Refractory Celiac Disease: What the Gastroenterologist Should Know.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  19. Evolution in coeliac disease diagnosis and management.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
    Review
  20. Review

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Al-TomaVU University Medical Centre, Department of Gastroenterology, P.O. Box 7057, 1005 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W H M Verbeek
M Hadithi
B M E von Blomberg
C J J Mulder
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoeliac disease may be regarded as refractory disease (RCD) when symptoms persist or recur despite strict adherence to a gluten-free diet. RCD may be subdivided into types I and II with a phenotypically normal and aberrant intraepithelial T-cell population, respectively. RCD I seems to respond well to azathioprine/prednisone therapy. RCD II is usually resistant to any known therapy and transition into enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) is common.

aimTo provide further insight into RCD and the development of EATL, by reporting on long-term survival and risk of transition of RCD into EATL in a large cohort of patients with complicated coeliac disease. DESIGN AND

methodsRetrospective comparison of responses to therapy in four groups of patients with complicated coeliac disease: 43, RCD I; 50, RCD II (total), of whom 26 with RCD II developed EATL after a period of refractoriness to a gluten-free diet (secondary EATL) and 13 were EATL patients without preceding history of complicated coeliac disease (de novo EATL).

resultsNo coeliac-disease-related mortality was recognised in the RCD I group. The overall 5-year survival in the RCD I group it was 96%; in the RCD II (total) group was 58%; and in the RCD II group after developing EATL it was only 8%. The 2-year survival in the de novo EATL group was 20% versus 15% in secondary EATL group (p = 0.63). Twenty-eight (56%) of the 50 patients with RCD II died, 23 (46%) due to EATL, 4 due to a progressive refractory state with emaciation and 1 from neurocoeliac disease.

conclusionRemarkably, no patient with RCD I developed RCD II or EATL within the mean follow-up period of 5 years (range 2-15 years). A total of 52% of the RCD II patients developed EATL within 4-6 years after the diagnosis of RCD II. More aggressive and targeted therapies seem necessary in RCD II and EATL.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCeliac DiseaseEpidemiologic MethodsFemaleGlutensHumansLymphoma, T-CellMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisTreatment OutcomeGlutens

Identifiers

PMID17470479
PMCPMC2000250
OpenAlexW2113669472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.