Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17470375›Full record

ReviewProgress in biophysics and molecular biology

Connexin channel permeability to cytoplasmic molecules.

Andrew L Harris

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in biophysics and molecular biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 266 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
266citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

266 citing papers in PubMed, 451 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Genome-wide study for signatures of selection identifies genomic regions and candidate genes associated with milk traits in sheep.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

206 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew L HarrisDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, New Jersey Medical School of UMDNJ, Newark, NJ 07103, USA. aharris@umdnj.edu
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

PHYSIOLOGY OF RECONSTITUTED GAP JUNCTION CHANNELSR01GM036044 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HARRIS, ANDREW L · 1986 to 2007
$1.4M
PROPERTIES OF CONNEXIN CHANNELS THAT CAUSE DEAFNESSR21DC007470 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HARRIS, ANDREW L · 2005 to 2006
$414k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC007470NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM036044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Connexin channels are known to be permeable to a variety of cytoplasmic molecules. The first observation of second messenger junctional permeability, made approximately 30 years ago, sparked broad interest in gap junction channels as mediators of intercellular molecular signaling. Since then, much has been learned about the diversity of connexin channels with regard to isoform diversity, tissue and developmental distribution, modes of channel regulation, assembly, expression, biochemical modification and permeability, all of which appear to be dynamically regulated. This information has expanded the potential roles of connexin channels in development, physiology and disease, and made their elucidation much more complex--30 years ago such an orchestra of junctional dynamics was unanticipated. Only recently, however, have investigators been able to directly address, in this more complex framework, the key issue: what specific biological molecules, second messengers and others, are able to permeate the various types of connexin channels, and how well? An important related issue, given the ever-growing list of connexin-related pathologies, is how these permeabilities are altered by disease-causing connexin mutations. Together, many studies show that a variety of cytoplasmic molecules can permeate the different types of connexin channels. A few studies reveal differences in permeation by different molecules through a particular type of connexin channel, and differences in permeation by a particular molecule through different types of connexin channels. This article describes and evaluates the various methods used to obtain these data, presents an annotated compilation of the results, and discusses the findings in the context of what can be inferred about mechanism of selectivity and potential relevance to signaling. The data strongly suggest that highly specific interactions take place between connexin pores and specific biological molecular permeants, and that those interactions determine which cytoplasmic molecules can permeate and how well. At this time, the nature of those interactions is unclear. One hopes that with more detailed permeability and structural information, the specific molecular mechanisms of the selectivity can be elucidated.

Indexed as

Ion Channel GatingModels, BiologicalCell Membrane PermeabilityConnexinsCytoplasmGap JunctionsModels, ChemicalProtein ConformationConnexins

Identifiers

PMID17470375
PMCPMC1995164
OpenAlexW2147611167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.