Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17468972›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2007

Comparative copro-diagnosis of Echinococcus multilocularis in experimentally infected foxes.

M N S Al-Sabi', C M O Kapel, P Deplazes, A Mathis

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How can environmental fecal sampling supportFood and waterborne parasitology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of Two DNA Extraction Methods and Two PCRs for Detection ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Surrogate hosts: Hunting dogs and recolonizing grey wolves share their endoparasites.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M N S Al-Sabi'Danish Centre for Experimental Parasitology, Faculty of Life Science, Copenhagen University, Dyrlaegevej 100, 1870 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
C M O Kapel
P Deplazes
A Mathis
University of Zurich · CHUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faecal samples from 15 foxes experimentally infected with Echinococcus multilocularis were examined until 90 days post-infection (dpi) by microscopical identification of eggs isolated by flotation/sieving, by coproantigen-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA), by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on DNA, respectively, isolated directly from the faecal samples (copro-DNA PCR) and from the eggs obtained by the flotation/sieving procedure (egg-DNA PCR). Based on egg counts, three periods of the infection were defined: pre-patent (2-29 dpi), high patent (30-70 dpi) and low patent periods (71-90 dpi). Whereas all methods were highly sensitive with samples from the high patent period, cELISA was the most sensitive to detect pre-patent infections (63%). Samples from the low patent infections were positive in 77% by microscopy and in 80% by egg-DNA PCR, being significantly more sensitive than cELISA and copro-DNA PCR. The isolation of eggs from the faecal material proved to be more sensitive by the flotation/sieving procedure as compared to the classical concentration McMaster technique.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, HelminthDNA, HelminthEchinococcosisEchinococcus multilocularisEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFoxesIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticMicroscopyParasite Egg CountPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityAntigens, HelminthDNA, Helminth

Identifiers

PMID17468972
OpenAlexW2087372155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.