Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17468883›Full record

ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2007

Signal transduction and information processing in mammalian taste buds.

Stephen D Roper

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 322 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Taste disorder's management: a systematic review.Clinical oral investigations · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The avian taste system.Frontiers in physiology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The evolution of sour taste.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Taste Bud Connectome: Implications for Taste Information Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  18. Mechanisms for the Sour Taste.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  19. The Role of ATP and Purinergic Receptors in Taste Signaling.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  20. Review

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen D RoperDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA. roper@miami.edu
University of Miami · US

Funding

CHEMOSENSORY TRANSDUCTION IN TASTE CELLSR01DC000374 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ROPER, STEPHEN D. · 1989 to 2012
$4.2M
A new method to measure taste bud functionR01DC007630 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ROPER, STEPHEN D. · 2006 to 2016
$3.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000374NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular machinery for chemosensory transduction in taste buds has received considerable attention within the last decade. Consequently, we now know a great deal about sweet, bitter, and umami taste mechanisms and are gaining ground rapidly on salty and sour transduction. Sweet, bitter, and umami tastes are transduced by G-protein-coupled receptors. Salty taste may be transduced by epithelial Na channels similar to those found in renal tissues. Sour transduction appears to be initiated by intracellular acidification acting on acid-sensitive membrane proteins. Once a taste signal is generated in a taste cell, the subsequent steps involve secretion of neurotransmitters, including ATP and serotonin. It is now recognized that the cells responding to sweet, bitter, and umami taste stimuli do not possess synapses and instead secrete the neurotransmitter ATP via a novel mechanism not involving conventional vesicular exocytosis. ATP is believed to excite primary sensory afferent fibers that convey gustatory signals to the brain. In contrast, taste cells that do have synapses release serotonin in response to gustatory stimulation. The postsynaptic targets of serotonin have not yet been identified. Finally, ATP secreted from receptor cells also acts on neighboring taste cells to stimulate their release of serotonin. This suggests that there is important information processing and signal coding taking place in the mammalian taste bud after gustatory stimulation.

Indexed as

AcidsAdenosine TriphosphateAnimalsCalcium SignalingCell CommunicationEpithelial Sodium Channel AgonistsEpithelial Sodium ChannelsHumansIon ChannelsNeurotransmitter AgentsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSecond Messenger SystemsSerotoninSodium Chloride, DietarySodium GlutamateStimulation, ChemicalAcidsAdenosine TriphosphateEpithelial Sodium Channel AgonistsEpithelial Sodium ChannelsIon ChannelsNeurotransmitter AgentsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSerotoninSodium Chloride, DietarySodium GlutamateSucrose

Identifiers

PMID17468883
PMCPMC3723147
OpenAlexW2012800318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.