Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17468167›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2007

Atomic force microscopy imaging of SWI/SNF action: mapping the nucleosome remodeling and sliding.

Fabien Montel, Emeline Fontaine, Philippe St-Jean, Martin Castelnovo, Cendrine Faivre-Moskalenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Remosomes: RSC generated non-mobilized particles with approximately 180 bp DNA loosely associated with the histone octamer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fabien MontelLaboratoire Joliot-Curie (CNRS USR 3010) et Laboratoire de Physique (CNRS UMR 5672), Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, 69007 Lyon, France.
Emeline Fontaine
Philippe St-Jean
Martin Castelnovo
Cendrine Faivre-Moskalenko

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a combined experimental (atomic force microscopy) and theoretical study of the structural and dynamical properties of nucleosomes. In contrast to biochemical approaches, this method allows us to determine simultaneously the DNA-complexed length distribution and nucleosome position in various contexts. First, we show that differences in the nucleoproteic structure observed between conventional H2A and H2A.Bbd variant nucleosomes induce quantitative changes in the length distribution of DNA-complexed with histones. Then, the sliding action of remodeling complex SWI/SNF is characterized through the evolution of the nucleosome position and wrapped DNA length mapping. Using a linear energetic model for the distribution of DNA-complexed length, we extract the net-wrapping energy of DNA onto the histone octamer and compare it to previous studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNAHistonesIn Vitro TechniquesMacromolecular SubstancesMicroscopy, Atomic ForceModels, BiologicalNuclear ProteinsNucleosomesRecombinant ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription FactorsXenopus laevisDNAHistonesMacromolecular SubstancesNuclear ProteinsNucleosomesRecombinant ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID17468167
PMCPMC1896249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.