Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17467317›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular graphics & modelling2007

Sphingosine 1-phosphate pKa and binding constants: intramolecular and intermolecular influences.

Mor M Naor, Michelle D Walker, James R Van Brocklyn, Gabor Tigyi, Abby L Parrill

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular graphics & modelling, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Lysophospholipid interactions with protein targets.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2008
    Review
  11. Molecular recognition in the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor family.Journal of molecular graphics & modelling · 2008
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mor M NaorDepartment of Chemistry and Computational Research on Materials Institute, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, United States.
Michelle D Walker
James R Van Brocklyn
Gabor Tigyi
Abby L Parrill
University of Memphis · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Ligand Recognition by Phospholipid Growth Factor ReceptorsR01CA092160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI TIGYI, GABOR J · 2001 to 2022
$5.9M
Computational Approach to Ligand Discovery for LPA GPCR and PPARR01HL084007 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI PARRILL, ABBY L. · 2006 to 2010
$2.1M
THERAPEUTICALLY PROMISING PHOSPHOLIPID GROWTH FACTORSR01HL061469 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI TIGYI, GABOR J · 1999 to 2006
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA092160NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL061469NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL084007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dissociation constant for an ionizable ligand binding to a receptor is dependent on its charge and therefore on its environmentally-influenced pKa value. The pKa values of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) were studied computationally in the context of the wild type S1P1 receptor and the following mutants: E3.29Q, E3.29A, and K5.38A. Calculated pKa values indicate that S1P binds to S1P1 and its site mutants with a total charge of -1, including a +1 charge on the ammonium group and a -2 charge on the phosphate group. The dissociation constant of S1P binding to these receptors was studied as well. The models of wild type and mutant proteins originated from an active receptor model that was developed previously. We used ab initio RHF/6-31+G(d) to optimize our models in aqueous solution, where the solvation energy derivatives are represented by conductor-like polarizable continuum model (C-PCM) and integral equation formalism polarizable continuum model (IEF-PCM). Calculation of the dissociation constant for each mutant was determined by reference to the experimental dissociation constant of the wild type receptor. The computed dissociation constants of the E3.29Q and E3.29A mutants are three to five orders of magnitude higher than those for the wild type receptor and K5.38A mutant, indicating vital contacts between the S1P phosphate group and the carboxylate group of E3.29. Computational dissociation constants for K5.38A, E3.29A, and E3.29Q mutants were compared with experimentally determined binding and activation data. No measurable binding of S1P to the E3.29A and E3.29Q mutants was observed, supporting the critical contacts observed computationally. These results validate the quantitative accuracy of the model.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesCell LineCell Line, TumorHumansKineticsLysophospholipidsModels, BiologicalModels, MolecularMolecular StructureMutagenesis, Site-DirectedMutationProtein BindingReceptors, LysosphingolipidSphingosineThermodynamicsLysophospholipidsReceptors, LysosphingolipidSphingosinesphingosine 1-phosphate

Identifiers

PMID17467317
PMCPMC2040500
OpenAlexW1973892716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.