Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17466825›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2007

eHealth research from the user's perspective.

Bradford W Hesse, Ben Shneiderman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
26.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Tables or bar graphs? Presenting test results in electronic medical records.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Riding the Wave of Digital Transformation in Behavioral Medicine.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Information Technology-Assisted Screening for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia in a Pediatric Emergency Department.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Role of the Internet in Solving the Last Mile Problem in Medicine.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bradford W HesseDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7365, USA. hesseb@mail.nih.gov
Ben Shneiderman
National Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of information technology (IT) to issues of healthcare delivery has had a long and tortuous history in the United States. Within the field of eHealth, vanguard applications of advanced computing techniques, such as applications in artificial intelligence or expert systems, have languished in spite of a track record of scholarly publication and decisional accuracy. The problem is one of purpose, of asking the right questions for the science to solve. Historically, many computer science pioneers have been tempted to ask "what can the computer do?" New advances in eHealth are prompting developers to ask "what can people do?" How can eHealth take part in national goals for healthcare reform to empower relationships between healthcare professionals and patients, healthcare teams and families, and hospitals and communities to improve health equitably throughout the population? To do this, eHealth researchers must combine best evidence from the user sciences (human factors engineering, human-computer interaction, psychology, and usability) with best evidence in medicine to create transformational improvements in the quality of care that medicine offers. These improvements should follow recommendations from the Institute of Medicine to create a healthcare system that is (1) safe, (2) effective (evidence based), (3) patient centered, and (4) timely. Relying on the eHealth researcher's intuitive grasp of systems issues, improvements should be made with considerations of users and beneficiaries at the individual (patient-physician), group (family-staff), community, and broad environmental levels.

Indexed as

InternetResearchUser-Computer InterfaceHumansMedical InformaticsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID17466825
PMCPMC1939873
OpenAlexW2036720635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.