Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17461889›Full record

ReviewCNS drug reviews2007

Levetiracetam: the profile of a novel anticonvulsant drug-part I: preclinical data.

Tim De Smedt, Robrecht Raedt, Kristl Vonck, Paul Boon

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drug reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Connectivity Mapping Using a NovelFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Mechanisms of organophosphate neurotoxicity.Current opinion in toxicology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Targeting Intracellular Calcium Stores Alleviates Neurological Morbidities in a DFP-Based Rat Model of Gulf War Illness.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tim De SmedtLaboratory for Clinical and Experimental Neurophysiology - Reference Center for Refractory Epilepsy, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium. T.DeSmedt@UGent.be
Robrecht Raedt
Kristl Vonck
Paul Boon
Ghent University Hospital · BEGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this article was to review and summarize the available reports on the preclinical profile of the novel anticonvulsant drug levetiracetam (LEV). Therefore, a careful search was conducted in the MEDLINE database and combined with guidelines from regulatory agencies, proceedings of professional scientific meetings, and information provided by the manufacturers. This article provides detailed information on the anticonvulsant effects of LEV in various animal models of epilepsy and on its pharmacology in laboratory animals. The mechanism of action of LEV is reviewed, with special regard to its recently discovered binding site, the synaptic vesicle protein 2A. In general, LEV is shown to be a safe, broad-spectrum anticonvulsant drug with highly beneficial pharmacokinetic properties and a distinct mechanism of action. The clinical studies with LEV will be discussed in the second part of this review article to be published subsequently.

Indexed as

Drug Evaluation, PreclinicalAnimalsAnticonvulsantsDisease Models, AnimalEpilepsyHumansLevetiracetamMEDLINEPiracetamAnticonvulsantsLevetiracetamPiracetam

Identifiers

PMID17461889
PMCPMC6494143
OpenAlexW1991969184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.