Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17461444›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of gastroenterology2007

Stool-based DNA testing, a new noninvasive method for colorectal cancer screening, the first report from Iran.

Mohammad Reza Abbaszadegan, Alireza Tavasoli, Arash Velayati, Hamid Reza Sima, Hassan Vosooghinia, Mehdi Farzadnia, Hamid Asadzedeh, Mehran Gholamin, Ezzat Dadkhah, Azadeh Aarabi

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of gastroenterology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [A non-invasive method for detecting mitochondrial tRNANan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2021
    Article
  11. Relationship betweenAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2020
    Article
  12. Comparison and evaluation of four methods for extracting DNA fromJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2017
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. p33Oncology letters · 2014
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammad Reza AbbaszadeganDivision of Human Genetics, Immunology Research Center, Bu-Ali Research Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. abbaszadegan@ams.ac.ir
Alireza Tavasoli
Arash Velayati
Hamid Reza Sima
Hassan Vosooghinia
Mehdi Farzadnia
Hamid Asadzedeh
Mehran Gholamin
Ezzat Dadkhah
Azadeh Aarabi
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo detect tumor-associated DNA changes in stool samples among Iranian patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to healthy individuals using BAT-26, p16 hypermethylation and long DNA markers.

methodsStool DNA was isolated from 45 subjects including 25 CRC patients and 20 healthy individuals using a new, fast and easy extraction method. Long DNA associated with tumor was detected using polymerase chain reaction method. Microsatellite studies were performed utilizing denaturating polyacrylamide gel to determine the instability of BAT-26. Methylation status of p16 promoter was analyzed using methylation-specific PCR (MSP).

resultsThe results showed a significant difference in existence of long DNA (16 in patients vs 1 in controls, P < 0.001) and p16 (5 in patients vs none in controls, P = 0.043) in the stool samples of two groups. Long DNA was detected in 64% of CRC patients; whereas just one of the healthy individuals was positive for Long DNA. p16 methylation was found in 20% of patients and in none of healthy individuals. Instability of BAT-26 was not detected in any of stool samples.

conclusionWe could detect colorectal cancer related genetic alterations by analyzing stool DNA with a sensitivity of 64% and 20% and a specificity of 95% and 100% for Long DNA and p16 respectively. A non-invasive molecular stool-based DNA testing can provide a screening strategy in high-risk individuals. However, additional testing on more samples is necessary from Iranian subjects to determine the exact specificity and sensitivity of these markers.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDNA MethylationDNA, NeoplasmFecesFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, p16Genetic MarkersGenetic TestingHumansIranMaleBAT26 microsatellite DNABiomarkers, TumorDNA, NeoplasmGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID17461444
PMCPMC4146894
OpenAlexW2128278891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.