Detecting the JAK2 V617F mutation in fresh and 'historic' blood and bone marrow.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Targeted sequencing of candidate gene regions for myelofibrosis in dogs.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2022
   Article
2. JAK2 p.V617F detection and allele burden measurement in peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirates in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.Blood · 2013
   Article
3. Recent advances in the diagnosis and classification of myeloid neoplasms--comments on the 2008 WHO classification.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2010
   Review
4. Molecular insights into the morphology of myeloproliferative neoplasms using an in situ PCR assay specific for the JAK2 mutation V617F.Leukemia · 2009
   Article
5. NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia occurring in JAK2-V617F+ primary myelofibrosis: de-novo origin?Leukemia · 2008
   Article
6. Quantitative assessment of the JAK2 V617F allele burden: equivalent levels in peripheral blood and bone marrow.Leukemia · 2008
   Article
7. Classification and diagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasms: the 2008 World Health Organization criteria and point-of-care diagnostic algorithms.Leukemia · 2008
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as