Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17460260›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2007

Comparative analysis of human conjunctival and corneal epithelial gene expression with oligonucleotide microarrays.

Helen C Turner, Murat T Budak, M A Murat Akinci, J Mario Wolosin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Cell atlas of the human ocular anterior segment: Tissue-specific and shared cell types.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. HCE-T cell line lacks cornea-specific differentiation markers compared to primary limbal epithelial cells and differentiated corneal epithelium.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Signature microRNAs in human cornea limbal epithelium.Functional & integrative genomics · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Antimicrobial compounds in tears.Experimental eye research · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helen C TurnerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029-6574, USA.
Murat T Budak
M A Murat Akinci
J Mario Wolosin
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

OCULAR SURFACE EPITHELIAL PRECURSORSR01EY014878 · NEI · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI WOLOSIN, JOSE MARIO · 2005 to 2015
$4.1M
OCULAR SURFACE STEM CELL GENESR03EY015132 · NEI · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI WOLOSIN, JOSE MARIO · 2004 to 2006
$498k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014878NEI NIH HHS R01EY014878NEI NIH HHS R03 EY015132NEI NIH HHS R03EY015132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine global mRNA expression levels in corneal and conjunctival epithelia and identify transcripts that exhibit preferential tissue expression.

methodscDNA samples derived from human conjunctival and corneal epithelia were hybridized in three independent experiments to a commercial oligonucleotide array representing more than 22,000 transcripts. The resultant signal intensities and microarray software transcript present/absent calls were used in conjunction with the local pooled error (LPE) statistical method to identify transcripts that are preferentially or exclusively expressed in one of the two tissues at significant levels (expression >1% of the beta-actin level). EASE (Expression Analysis Systematic Explorer software) was used to identify biological systems comparatively overrepresented in either epithelium. Immuno-, and cytohistochemistry was performed to validate or expand on selected results of interest.

resultsThe analysis identified 332 preferential and 93 exclusive significant corneal epithelial transcripts. The corresponding numbers of conjunctival epithelium transcripts were 592 and 211, respectively. The overrepresented biological processes in the cornea were related to cell adhesion and oxiredox equilibria and cytoprotection activities. In the conjunctiva, the biological processes that were most prominent were related to innate immunity and melanogenesis. Immunohistochemistry for antigen-presenting cells and melanocytes was consistent with these gene signatures. The transcript comparison identified a substantial number of genes that have either not been identified previously or are not known to be highly expressed in these two epithelia, including testican-1, ECM1, formin, CRTAC1, and NQO1 in the cornea and, in the conjunctiva, sPLA(2)-IIA, lipocalin 2, IGFBP3, multiple MCH class II proteins, and the Na-Pi cotransporter type IIb.

conclusionsComparative gene expression profiling leads to the identification of many biological processes and previously unknown genes that are potentially active in the function of corneal and conjunctival epithelia.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisAdultAgedConjunctivaCorneaEpithelial CellsEye ProteinsFemaleFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectGene ExpressionHumansMaleMiddle AgedReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerEye ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID17460260
PMCPMC2909883
OpenAlexW2028284319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.