Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17460050›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2007

Assessment of fluorescent in situ hybridization and PCR-based methods for rapid identification of Burkholderia cepacia complex organisms directly from sputum samples.

A R Brown, J R W Govan

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rapid detection ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. rpsU-based discrimination within the genus Burkholderia.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2014
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A R BrownCystic Fibrosis Group, Centre for Infectious Diseases, University of Edinburgh, The Chancellor's Building, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, United Kingdom. alan.brown@ed.ac.uk
J R W Govan
University of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several species within the Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) have emerged as significant opportunistic pathogens of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). BCC infection is typically associated with a poor clinical prognosis and decreased survival. These factors, combined with the existence of highly transmissible epidemic strains, have resulted in strict segregation of BCC- and non-BCC-infected patients to minimize cross infection. Accurate and rapid diagnosis of infections is essential to enable appropriate patient management. However, the rapidly evolving taxonomy of BCC poses a considerable challenge to diagnostics. In the present study, we assessed a commercially available fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) assay (seaFAST Cystic Fibrosis I kit) and a novel rRNA gene-based PCR assay for the rapid identification of BCC-positive sputa, irrespective of the BCC species. We report that, while the FISH assay fails to identify all BCC species, it does identify the majority of species, including the two most clinically relevant species, B. multivorans and B. cenocepacia. The sensitivity of the assay applied to sputum was limited by nonspecific background fluorescence. While sputum processing was optimized to minimize background, the resulting sensitivity for BCC detection was 8 x 10(5) CFU/ml. In contrast, the novel PCR assay reported herein exhibits 100% sensitivity and specificity for all BCC species and can detect 10(4) CFU/ml when applied to sputum. This novel rRNA gene-based assay is currently the most sensitive BCC-specific PCR assay for the detection of BCC direct from clinical samples and as such is a valuable addition to the field of BCC diagnostics.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesBurkholderia cepacia complexBurkholderia InfectionsCystic FibrosisDNA, BacterialHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePolymerase Chain ReactionReagent Kits, DiagnosticRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSputumTime FactorsDNA, BacterialReagent Kits, DiagnosticRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID17460050
PMCPMC1933040
OpenAlexW2137643135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.