Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17458558›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2007

Grading invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: advantages of using automated proliferation index instead of mitotic count.

Ossama Tawfik, Bruce F Kimler, Marilyn Davis, Christopher Stasik, Sue-Min Lai, Matthew S Mayo, Fang Fan, John K Donahue, Ivan Damjanov, Patricia Thomas and 4 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ossama TawfikDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA. otawfik@kumc.edu.
Bruce F Kimler
Marilyn Davis
Christopher Stasik
Sue-Min Lai
Matthew S Mayo
Fang Fan
John K Donahue
Ivan Damjanov
Patricia Thomas
Carol Connor
William R Jewell
Holly Smith
Carol J Fabian

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast carcinomas are graded according to the "Nottingham modification of the Bloom-Richardson system" (SBR). The system is hindered, however, by lack of precision in assessing all three parameters including nuclear grade, mitosis, and tubular formation, leading to an element of subjectivity. Our objective was to evaluate a new grading system [the nuclear grade plus proliferation (N+P) system] for subjectivity, ease, and better representation of tumor biology. Its components are nuclear grade and automated proliferation index. Invasive ductal carcinomas, consisting of 137 SBR grade I, 247 grade II, and 266 grade III, were re-evaluated by the N+P system. The two systems were compared with each other and correlated with patients' overall survival, tumor size, angiolymphatic invasion, lymph node status, and biomarker status including estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, p53, epidermal growth factor receptor, BCL-2, and Her-2. Although there was an agreement between the two systems with histologic and prognostic parameters studied, there was 37% disagreement when grading individual tumors. Fifty-three percent of SBR grade II tumors were "down-graded" to N+P grade I, and 7% were "up-graded" to N+P grade III. Distinction among the different histologic grades for overall survival curves was better indicated by the N+P than the SBR system.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCell ProliferationCohort StudiesFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedMitotic IndexNeoplasm InvasivenessPredictive Value of TestsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.