Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17457973›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2007

Advanced imaging and visualization in gastrointestinal disorders.

Odd Helge Gilja, Jan G Hatlebakk, Svein Odegaard, Arnold Berstad, Ivan Viola, Christopher Giertsen, Trygve Hausken, Hans Gregersen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gastrointestinal tract modelling in health and disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2009
    Review
  10. Imaging of the gastrointestinal tract-novel technologies.World journal of gastroenterology · 2009
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Odd Helge GiljaNational Centre for Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen N-5021, Norway. odd.gilja@uib.no
Jan G Hatlebakk
Svein Odegaard
Arnold Berstad
Ivan Viola
Christopher Giertsen
Trygve Hausken
Hans Gregersen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced medical imaging and visualization has a strong impact on research and clinical decision making in gastroenterology. The aim of this paper is to show how imaging and visualization can disclose structural and functional abnormalities of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Imaging methods such as ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoscopy, endosonography, and elastography will be outlined and visualization with Virtual Reality and haptic methods. Ultrasonography is a versatile method that can be used to evaluate antral contractility, gastric emptying, transpyloric flow, gastric configuration, intragastric distribution of meals, gastric accommodation and strain measurement of the gastric wall. Advanced methods for endoscopic ultrasound, three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound, and tissue Doppler (Strain Rate Imaging) provide detailed information of the GI tract. Food hypersensitivity reactions including gastrointestinal reactions due to food allergy can be visualized by ultrasonography and MRI. Development of multi-parametric and multi-modal imaging may increase diagnostic benefits and facilitate fusion of diagnostic and therapeutic imaging in the future.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingEndosonographyEsophagusFood HypersensitivityGastric EmptyingGastrointestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal MotilityHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID17457973
PMCPMC4146926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.