Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17457539›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2007

Applications of RNA interference: current state and prospects for siRNA-based strategies in vivo.

Achim Aigner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Recent Advances of Chitosan Formulations in Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Non-covalent Encapsulation of siRNA with Cell-Penetrating Peptides.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. A review on current status of antiviral siRNA.Reviews in medical virology · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Achim AignerDepartment Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medicine, Philipps-University Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Strasse 1, 35033, Marburg, Germany. aigner@staff.uni-marburg.de

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the recent years, RNA interference (RNAi) has become an almost-standard method for in vitro knockdown of any target gene of interest. Now, one major focus is to further explore its potential in vivo, including the development of novel therapeutic strategies. From the mechanism, it becomes clear that small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) play a pivotal role in triggering RNAi. Thus, the efficient delivery of target gene-specific siRNAs is one major challenge in the establishment of therapeutic RNAi. Numerous studies, based on different modes of administration and various siRNA formulations and/or modifications, have already accumulated promising results. This applies to various animal models covering viral infections, cancer and multiple other diseases. Continuing efforts will lead to the development of efficient and "double-specific" drugs, comprising of siRNAs with high target gene specificity and of nanoparticles enhancing siRNA delivery and target organ specificity.

Indexed as

RNA InterferenceRNA, Small InterferingAnimalsChemistry, PharmaceuticalClinical Trials as TopicGene SilencingGene TargetingHumansNeoplasmsVirus DiseasesRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID17457539
PMCPMC7079960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.