Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17457344›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2007

Innate immunity of the newborn: basic mechanisms and clinical correlates.

Ofer Levy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 578 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
578citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

578 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,195 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Innate immunity: current understandings and future perspectives.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Immune development in early life.Nature immunology · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. A machine learning system enables just-in-time risk-stratified sepsis evaluations in the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

518 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ofer LevyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. ofer.levy@childrens.harvard.edu
Boston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fetus and newborn face a complex set of immunological demands, including protection against infection, avoidance of harmful inflammatory immune responses that can lead to pre-term delivery, and balancing the transition from a sterile intra-uterine environment to a world that is rich in foreign antigens. These demands shape a distinct neonatal innate immune system that is biased against the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This bias renders newborns at risk of infection and impairs responses to many vaccines. This Review describes innate immunity in newborns and discusses how this knowledge might be used to prevent and treat infection in this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateAnimalsAnimals, NewbornFemaleFetusHumansImmune SystemInfant, NewbornPlacentaPregnancyUterus

Identifiers

PMID17457344
OpenAlexW2070416023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.