ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2007
DDOMAIN: Dividing structures into domains using a normalized domain-domain interaction profile.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- CASP16 Protein Monomer Structure Prediction Assessment.Proteins · 2026Article
- Hierarchical Analysis of Protein Structures: From Secondary Structures to Protein Units and Domains.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Article
- To split or not to split: CASP15 targets and their processing into tertiary structure evaluation units.Proteins · 2023Article
- Identification of a Putative SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Inhibitor through In Silico Screening of Self-Designed Molecular Library.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- A unified approach to protein domain parsing with inter-residue distance matrix.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Assignment of structural domains in proteins using diffusion kernels on graphs.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Res-Dom: predicting protein domain boundary from sequence using deep residual network and Bi-LSTM.Bioinformatics advances · 2022Article
- Target classification in the 14th round of the critical assessment of protein structure prediction (CASP14).Proteins · 2021Article
- Protein domain identification methods and online resources.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Deep learning enables the atomic structure determination of the Fanconi Anemia core complex from cryoEM.IUCrJ · 2020Article
- FUpred: detecting protein domains through deep-learning-based contact map prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Article
- Physical Background of the Disordered Nature of "Mutual Synergetic Folding" Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Evaluation system and web infrastructure for the second cryo-EM model challenge.Journal of structural biology · 2018Article
- An ambiguity principle for assigning protein structural domains.Science advances · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
- High-resolution comparative modeling with RosettaCM.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2013Article
- IS-Dom: a dataset of independent structural domains automatically delineated from protein structures.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dividing protein structures into domains is proven useful for more accurate structural and functional characterization of proteins. Here, we develop a method, called DDOMAIN, that divides structure into DOMAINs using a normalized contact-based domain-domain interaction profile. Results of DDOMAIN are compared to AUTHORS annotations (domain definitions are given by the authors who solved protein structures), as well as to popular SCOP and CATH annotations by human experts and automatic programs. DDOMAIN's automatic annotations are most consistent with the AUTHORS annotations (90% agreement in number of domains and 88% agreement in both number of domains and at least 85% overlap in domain assignment of residues) if its three adjustable parameters are trained by the AUTHORS annotations. By comparison, the agreement is 83% (81% with at least 85% overlap criterion) between SCOP-trained DDOMAIN and SCOP annotations and 77% (73%) between CATH-trained DDOMAIN and CATH annotations. The agreement between DDOMAIN and AUTHORS annotations goes beyond single-domain proteins (97%, 82%, and 56% for single-, two-, and three-domain proteins, respectively). For an "easy" data set of proteins whose CATH and SCOP annotations agree with each other in number of domains, the agreement is 90% (89%) between "easy-set"-trained DDOMAIN and CATH/SCOP annotations. The consistency between SCOP-trained DDOMAIN and SCOP annotations is superior to two other recently developed, SCOP-trained, automatic methods PDP (protein domain parser), and DomainParser 2. We also tested a simple consensus method made of PDP, DomainParser 2, and DDOMAIN and a different version of DDOMAIN based on a more sophisticated statistical energy function. The DDOMAIN server and its executable are available in the services section on http://sparks.informatics.iupui.edu.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.