Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17452662›Full record

SynthesisCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2007

The consequences of waiting for cataract surgery: a systematic review.

William Hodge, Tanya Horsley, David Albiani, Julia Baryla, Michel Belliveau, Ralf Buhrmann, Michael O'Connor, Jason Blair, Elizabeth Lowcock

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06506669 (Comparing Two Normal Approaches to Procedural Sedation for Cataract Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06506669 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparing Two Normal Approaches to Procedural Sedation for Cataract Surgery: A Prospective, Feasibility Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2024 to 2025Enrolled23ConditionsCataract, Bilateral Senile Cataract, Anesthesia, Patient SatisfactionArmsOral sedation, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sub-Tenon's anaesthesia versus topical anaesthesia for cataract surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Cataract.BMJ clinical evidence · 2008
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Association between model of anesthesiology care and outcomes after cataract surgery: a population-based cohort study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

William HodgeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Ottawa Eye Institute, Ottawa, Ont. whodge@ottawahospital.on.ca
Tanya Horsley
David Albiani
Julia Baryla
Michel Belliveau
Ralf Buhrmann
Michael O'Connor
Jason Blair
Elizabeth Lowcock

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCataract surgery is the most common operative procedure performed in Canada, and how patients are affected by wait times for this surgery has important clinical, public health and health policy considerations. We conducted a systematic review to understand the relation between wait time for cataract surgery and patient outcomes and the variables that modify this relation.

methodsWe performed an electronic search of 11 databases and the proceedings of 4 conferences. The search was restricted to studies published after the transition to phacoemulsification (1990). We assessed the quality of the included studies using the Jadad Scale for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort and case-control studies. The data were found to be inappropriate for meta-analysis, thus we performed a qualitative synthesis.

resultsWe found a total of 27 studies that met our inclusion criteria. When these studies were reviewed, a dichotomy was observed for the wait time-outcome relation: outcomes associated with wait times of <or= 6 weeks were better than outcomes associated with wait times of >or= 6 months. Patients who waited more than 6 months to receive cataract surgery experienced more vision loss, a reduced quality of life and had an increased rate of falls compared with patients who had wait times of less than 6 weeks. The outcomes associated with wait times between 6 weeks and 6 months remain unclear.

interpretationPatients who wait more than 6 months for cataract surgery may experience negative outcomes during the wait period, including vision loss, a reduced quality of life and an increased rate of falls.

Indexed as

Waiting ListsAccidental FallsAgedCanadaCataract ExtractionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeRisk AssessmentTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID17452662
PMCPMC1852875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.