Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17452469›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2007

Human monoclonal antibody AVP-21D9 to protective antigen reduces dissemination of the Bacillus anthracis Ames strain from the lungs in a rabbit model.

Johnny W Peterson, Jason E Comer, Wallace B Baze, David M Noffsinger, Autumn Wenglikowski, Kristin G Walberg, Jason Hardcastle, Jennifer Pawlik, Kathryn Bush, Joanna Taormina and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Anti-infective immunoadhesins from plants.Plant biotechnology journal · 2015
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Johnny W PetersonDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555-1070, USA. johnny.peterson@utmb.edu
Jason E Comer
Wallace B Baze
David M Noffsinger
Autumn Wenglikowski
Kristin G Walberg
Jason Hardcastle
Jennifer Pawlik
Kathryn Bush
Joanna Taormina
Scott Moen
John Thomas
Bagram M Chatuev
Laurie Sower
Ashok K Chopra
Lawrence R Stanberry
Ritsuko Sawada
Wolfgang W Scholz
Jagadish Sircar
John Sealy Hospital · USAvanir Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

Task 7 (C29): Development of a Small Animal Model for Dengue N01AI30065 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · 2007 to 2009
$11.1M
Development of Therapeutic Inhibitors to Anthrax ToxinsU01AI053858 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI PETERSON, JOHNNY WAYNE · 2002 to 2006
$2.5M
Human Antibodies for Exposure/Protection from AnthraxR43AI058458 · NIAID · AVANIR PHARMACEUTICALS · PI SCHOLZ, WOLFGANG W · 2004 to 2005
$750k
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030065NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI 30065NIAID NIH HHS R43 AI058458NIAID NIH HHS R43 AI 058458-02NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI 53858-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dutch-belted and New Zealand White rabbits were passively immunized with AVP-21D9, a human monoclonal antibody to protective antigen (PA), at the time of Bacillus anthracis spore challenge using either nasal instillation or aerosol challenge techniques. AVP-21D9 (10 mg/kg) completely protected both rabbit strains against lethal infection with Bacillus anthracis Ames spores, regardless of the inoculation method. Further, all but one of the passively immunized animals (23/24) were completely resistant to rechallenge with spores by either respiratory challenge method at 5 weeks after primary challenge. Analysis of the sera at 5 weeks after primary challenge showed that residual human anti-PA levels decreased by 85 to 95%, but low titers of rabbit-specific anti-PA titers were also measured. Both sources of anti-PA could have contributed to protection from rechallenge. In a subsequent study, bacteriological and histopathology analyses revealed that B. anthracis disseminated to the bloodstream in some naïve animals as early as 24 h postchallenge and increased in frequency with time. AVP-21D9 significantly reduced the dissemination of the bacteria to the bloodstream and to various organs following infection. Examination of tissue sections from infected control animals, stained with hematoxylin-eosin and the Gram stain, showed edema and/or hemorrhage in the lungs and the presence of bacteria in mediastinal lymph nodes, with necrosis and inflammation. Tissue sections from infected rabbits dosed with AVP-21D9 appeared comparable to corresponding tissues from uninfected animals despite lethal challenge with B. anthracis Ames spores. Concomitant treatment with AVP-21D9 at the time of challenge conferred complete protection in the rabbit inhalation anthrax model. Early treatment increased the efficacy progressively and in a dose-dependent manner. Thus, AVP-21D9 could offer an adjunct or alternative clinical treatment regimen against inhalation anthrax.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAdministration, InhalationAnimalsAnthraxAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, BacterialBacillus anthracisBacterial ToxinsHumansLungRabbitsSpores, Bacterialanthrax toxinAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, BacterialBacterial Toxins

Identifiers

PMID17452469
PMCPMC1932953
OpenAlexW2133957205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.