Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17449504›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2007

"I haven't even phoned my doctor yet." The advice giving role of the pharmacist during consultations for medication review with patients aged 80 or more: qualitative discourse analysis.

Charlotte Salter, Richard Holland, Ian Harvey, Karen Henwood

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Patient reactions to community pharmacies' roles: evidence from the Portuguese market.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  15. Communication relating to family members' involvement and understandings about patients' medication management in hospital.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charlotte SalterSchool of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ. c.salter@uea.ac.uk
Richard Holland
Ian Harvey
Karen Henwood

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the advice giving role of pharmacists during consultation for medication review with patients aged 80 or more.

designDiscourse analysis.

settingParticipants' homes.

participantsSubsample of consultations within a large randomised trial of home medication review among patients aged 80 or more who had been admitted to hospital.

main outcome measuresExtent to which advice given by pharmacists was accepted and acknowledged by patients.

resultsPharmacists found many opportunities to offer advice, information, and instruction. These advice giving modes were rarely initiated by the patients and were given despite a no problem response and deliberate displays of competence and knowledge by patients. Advice was often resisted or rejected and created interactional difficulties and awkward moments during the consultations.

conclusionsThe advice giving role of pharmacists during consultations with patients aged 80 or more has the potential to undermine and threaten the patients' assumed competence, integrity, and self governance. Caution is needed in assuming that commonsense interventions necessarily lead to health gain.

Indexed as

Professional-Patient RelationsAgedAged, 80 and overCommunity Pharmacy ServicesCounselingFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansMalePatient ParticipationReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID17449504
PMCPMC1877907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.