Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17447149›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2007

Epigenomic differentiation in mouse preimplantation nuclei of biparental, parthenote and cloned embryos.

Valeria Merico, Jessica Barbieri, Maurizio Zuccotti, Boris Joffe, Thomas Cremer, Carlo Alberto Redi, Irina Solovei, Silvia Garagna

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Specification of the First Mammalian Cell Lineages In Vivo and In Vitro.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2020
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Transplantation of nucleoli into human zygotes: not as simple as expected?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Spatial quantitative analysis of fluorescently labeled nuclear structures: problems, methods, pitfalls.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2008
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Valeria MericoDipartimento di Biologia Animale, Laboratorio di Biologia dello Sviluppo, Piazza Botta 9, Universita' degli Studi di Pavia, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
Jessica Barbieri
Maurizio Zuccotti
Boris Joffe
Thomas Cremer
Carlo Alberto Redi
Irina Solovei
Silvia Garagna
University of Pavia · ITLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomes, sub-chromosomal regions and genes are repositioned during cell differentiation to acquire a cell-type-specific spatial organization. The constraints that are responsible for this cell-type-specific spatial genome positioning are unknown. In this study we addressed the question of whether epigenetic genome modifications may represent constraints to the acquisition of a specific nuclear organization. The organization of kinetochores, pericentric heterochromatin and the nucleolus was analysed in pre-implantation mouse embryos obtained by in-vitro fertilization (IVF), parthenogenetic activation (P) and nuclear transfer (NT) of differentiated somatic nuclei, which possess different epigenomes. Each stage of pre-implantation embryonic development is characterized by a stage-specific spatial organization of nucleoli, kinetochores and pericentric heterochromatin. Despite differences in the frequencies and the time-course of nuclear architecture reprogramming events, by the eight-cell stage P and NT embryos achieved the same distinct nuclear organization in the majority of embryos as observed for IVF embryos. At this stage the gametic or somatic nuclear architecture of IVF or P and NT embryos, respectively, is replaced by a common embryonic nuclear architecture. This finding suggests that the epigenome of the three types of embryos partially acts as a constraint of the nuclear organization of the three nuclear subcompartments analysed.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell NucleusEpigenesis, GeneticReproductive TechniquesAnimalsCell Nucleus StructuresCloning, OrganismEmbryo ImplantationEmbryo, MammalianFertilization in VitroGenomicsMiceNuclear Transfer TechniquesParthenogenesis

Identifiers

PMID17447149
OpenAlexW1975486808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.