Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17447078›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2007

Malignant neoplasms of the appendix.

Mark E O'Donnell, Stephen A Badger, Garth C Beattie, Jim Carson, W Ian H Garstin

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Molecular and Clinicopathologic Impact of GNAS Variants Across Solid Tumors.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Molecular Classification of Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  9. Neoplasms of the appendix: Single institution and ten-year experiences results.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark E O'DonnellDepartment of Surgery, Antrim Area Hospital, Northern Ireland, UK. modonnell904@hotmail.com
Stephen A Badger
Garth C Beattie
Jim Carson
W Ian H Garstin
Antrim Area Hospital · GBŁukasiewicz Research Network - Wood Technology Institute · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAppendiceal neoplasms, first described in 1882, are still rare, with pre-operative diagnosis invariably difficult. We present our 10-year experience of these lesions with a review of current epidemiology, pathology and treatment modalities. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective histopathological review of all appendicectomy specimens was completed between April 1994 and December 2003 to identify patients diagnosed with malignant neoplasms. Patient demographics, operative details, histopathology and clinical outcomes were obtained from case notes. A literature search of the PubMed database was then performed using the medical search headings; appendix, tumour, neoplasm and malignancy.

resultsTwenty-two patients (eight men) were identified during the study period, with no age difference between gender (mean age in women 58, range 14-83 vs mean age in men 55, range 16-78). Eleven patients were found to have carcinoid-type tumours, eight patients with adenocarcinomas and three patients with lymphomas. Other appendiceal pathologies were identified after appendicectomies, hemicolectomy and oophorectomy. Mean follow-up was 41 months (range 1-125 months). Fourteen patients were alive at the end of follow-up. Patients with classical carcinoid tumours (CCT) had better outcomes than patients with the goblet cell carcinoid, adenocarcinoma and lymphoma.

conclusionsFrom our own experience and a subsequent review of the literature, we recommend right hemicolectomy as the treatment of choice for all malignant appendiceal neoplasms, except for small CCT less than 2 cm in diameter at the tip of the appendix, with a low proliferative index, without angiolymphatic or mesoappendiceal extension. Further adjuvant therapy should be considered after oncological assessment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAppendiceal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID17447078
OpenAlexW2088541237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.