ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2007
[Esophageal carcinoma].
Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stemness signature RBBP7 reprograms the immune microenvironment to inform a prognostic model in esophageal carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Anastomotic Leakage after Oesophagectomy: Upper Endoscopy or Computed Tomography First? Time Is of the Essence.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is more than ever a surgical problem. Modern diagnostic procedures facilitate individual staging, and risk analysis is important for adequate patient selection. Using both allows an individualized indication. Under multimodal therapeutic protocols, neoadjuvant treatment can best be evaluated and is recommended in locally advanced tumors: RCTx in SCC, and CTx in Barrett cancer. Here the Ivor-Lewis procedure is the surgical method of choice. Postoperative complications are always possible, but the management now is standardized and has largely decreased mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.