Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17446248›Full record

Trial reportInjury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention2007

"Risk Watch": cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating an injury prevention program.

Denise Kendrick, Lindsay Groom, Jane Stewart, Michael Watson, Caroline Mulvaney, Rebecca Casterton

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Preventing unintentional injuries to children under 15 years in the outdoors: a systematic review of the effectiveness of educational programs.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2012
    Pooled it
  9. Interventions for promoting smoke alarm ownership and function.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Denise KendrickDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK. denise.kendrick@nottingham.ac.uk
Lindsay Groom
Jane Stewart
Michael Watson
Caroline Mulvaney
Rebecca Casterton

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto evaluate the effectiveness of a school-based injury prevention program.

designCluster randomised controlled trial.

setting20 primary schools in Nottingham, UK.

participants459 children aged 7 to 10 years.

interventionThe "Risk Watch" program delivered by teachers, aimed at improving bike and pedestrian, falls, poisoning and fire and burns safety.

main outcome measuresSafety knowledge, observed safety skills and self-reported safety behaviour.

resultsAt follow-up, intervention group children correctly answered more fire and burn prevention knowledge questions than control group children (difference between means 7.0% (95% CI 1.5% to 12.6%)). Children in intervention group schools were more likely to know the correct actions to take if clothes catch fire and the correct way to wear a cycle helmet (difference between school means 35.3% (95% CI 22.7% to 47.9%) and 6.3% (95% CI 1.4% to 11.1%) respectively). They were also more likely to know the correct actions to take in a house fire and on finding tablets (OR 2.80 (95% CI 1.08 to 7.22) and OR 3.50 (95% CI 1.18 to 10.38) respectively) and correctly demonstrated more safety skills than control group children (difference between means 11.9% (95% CI 1.4% to 22.5%)). There was little evidence to suggest the first year of the program impacted on self-reported safety behaviours.

conclusionsThe Risk Watch program delivered by teachers in primary schools increased some aspects of children's safety knowledge and skills and primary schools should consider delivering this program. Longer term, larger scale evaluations are required to examine retention of knowledge and skills and impact on safety behaviours and child injury rates.

Indexed as

Accident PreventionChildChild BehaviorEnglandFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareProgram EvaluationSafetySchoolsWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID17446248
PMCPMC2610598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.