Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17445943›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2007

Silencing by imprinted noncoding RNAs: is transcription the answer?

Florian M Pauler, Martha V Koerner, Denise P Barlow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Multiple copy number variants ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exploring the secrets of long noncoding RNAs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Human RNAi pathway: crosstalk with organelles and cells.Functional & integrative genomics · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Long non-coding RNAs in haematological malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2013
    Review
  19. Transgene- and locus-dependent imprinting reveals allele-specific chromosome conformations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Florian M PaulerCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, c/o Institute of Genetics, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Vienna Biocenter, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9/4, A1030 Vienna, Austria.
Martha V Koerner
Denise P Barlow

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF F 1718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) with gene regulatory functions are starting to be seen as a common feature of mammalian gene regulation with the discovery that most of the transcriptome is ncRNA. The prototype has long been the Xist ncRNA, which induces X-chromosome inactivation in female cells. However, a new paradigm is emerging--the silencing of imprinted gene clusters by long ncRNAs. Here, we review models by which imprinted ncRNAs could function. We argue that an Xist-like model is only one of many possible solutions and that imprinted ncRNAs could provide the better model for understanding the function of the new class of ncRNAs associated with non-imprinted mammalian genes.

Indexed as

Gene SilencingGenomic ImprintingTranscription, GeneticDosage Compensation, GeneticGene Expression RegulationGenome, HumanHumansRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, UntranslatedX Chromosome InactivationRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, UntranslatedXIST non-coding RNA

Identifiers

PMID17445943
PMCPMC2847181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.