Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17445314›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2008

Uptake of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in at-risk populations in England and Wales 1999-2005.

R G Pebody, J Hippisley-Cox, S Harcourt, M Pringle, M Painter, G Smith

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Identification of new risk factors for pneumonia: population-based case-control study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R G PebodyHPA Centre for Infections, London, UK. Richard.Pebody@hpa.org.uk
J Hippisley-Cox
S Harcourt
M Pringle
M Painter
G Smith
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The UK has had a pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination (PPV) programme for groups at higher risk of invasive disease since 1992. This paper presents data from a sample of primary-care practices (Q-RESEARCH) of PPV uptake in patients according to their risk status. Of 2.9 million registered patients in 2005, 2.1% were vaccinated with PPV in the preceding 12 months and 6.5% in the preceding 5 years. Twenty-nine per cent of the registered population fell into one or more risk groups. The proportion of each risk group vaccinated in the previous 5 years ranged from 69% (cochlear implants), 53.4% (splenic dysfunction), 36.5% (chronic heart disease), 34.7% (diabetes), 22.9% (immunosuppressed), 28.7% (chronic renal disease), 15.9% (sickle cell disease) to 12.6% (chronic respiratory disease). Uptake was lower in areas where the non-white proportion of population was >10%. In conclusion, there remain large gaps in the uptake of PPV in several high-risk populations in the United Kingdom. Effective strategies need to be developed to address these deficiencies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionChildChild, PreschoolEnglandFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedPneumococcal InfectionsPneumococcal VaccinesPrevalencePneumococcal Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID17445314
PMCPMC2870812
OpenAlexW2128879800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.