SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007
Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 154 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
154 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Response is increased using postal rather than electronic questionnaires - new results from an updated Cochrane Systematic Review.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Pooled it
- Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Does advance contact with research participants increase response to questionnaires: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Pooled it
- Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Psychometric properties of implementation measures for public health and community settings and mapping of constructs against the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Internet-based randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2013Pooled it
- The effects of tracking responses and the day of mailing on physician survey response rate: three randomized trials.PloS one · 2011Pooled it
- Personally addressed hand-signed letters increase questionnaire response: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMC health services research · 2006Pooled it
- Collagenase injection versus limited fasciectomy surgery to treat Dupuytren's contracture in adult patients in the UK: DISC, a non-inferiority RCT and economic evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Trial
- Improving postal survey response using behavioural science: a nested randomised control trial.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Trial
- The OMACS-PIL study: a randomised controlled trial within the OMACS observational study.Trials · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2015Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- The Sexunzipped trial: optimizing the design of online randomized controlled trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2013Trial
94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostal questionnaires are widely used for data collection in epidemiological studies but non-response reduces the effective sample size and can introduce bias. Finding ways to increase response rates to postal questionnaires would improve the quality of health research.
objectivesTo identify effective strategies to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. SEARCH STRATEGY: We aimed to find all randomised controlled trials of strategies to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. We searched 14 electronic databases to February 2003 and manually searched the reference lists of relevant trials and reviews, and all issues of two journals. We contacted the authors of all trials or reviews to ask about unpublished trials. Where necessary, authors were also contacted to confirm methods of allocation used and to clarify results presented. We assessed the eligibility of each trial using pre-defined criteria. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data on the trial participants, the intervention, the number randomised to intervention and comparison groups and allocation concealment. For each strategy, we estimated pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals in a random effects model. Evidence for selection bias was assessed using Egger's weighted regression method and Begg's rank correlation test and funnel plot. Heterogeneity among trial odds ratios was assessed using a chi-square test at a 5% significance level and the degree of inconsistency between trial results was quantified using I(2). MAIN
resultsWe found 372 eligible trials. The trials evaluated 98 different ways of increasing response rates to postal questionnaires and for 62 of these the combined trials included over 1,000 participants. We found substantial heterogeneity among trial results in half of the strategies. The odds of response were at least doubled using monetary incentives (odds ratio 1.99, 95% CI 1.81 to 2.18; heterogeneity p<0.00001, I(2)=78%), recorded delivery (2.04, 1.60 to 2.61; p=0.0004, I(2)=69%), a teaser on the envelope - e.g. a comment suggesting to participants that they may benefit if they open it (3.08, 1.27 to 7.44) and a more interesting questionnaire topic (2.44, 1.99 to 3.01; p=0.74, I(2)=0%). The odds of response were substantially higher with pre-notification (1.50, 1.29 to 1.74; p<0.00001, I(2)=90%), follow-up contact (1.44, 1.25 to 1.65; p<0.0001, I(2)=68%), unconditional incentives (1.61, 1.27 to 2.04; p<0.00001, I(2)=91%), shorter questionnaires (1.73, 1.47 to 2.03; p<0.00001, I(2)=93%), providing a second copy of the questionnaire at follow-up (1.51, 1.13 to 2.00; p<0.00001, I(2)=83%), mentioning an obligation to respond (1.61, 1.16 to 2.22; p=0.98, I(2)=0%) and university sponsorship (1.32, 1.13 to 1.54; p<0.00001, I(2)=83%). The odds of response were also increased with non-monetary incentives (1.13, 1.07 to 1.21; p<0.00001, I(2)=71%), personalised questionnaires (1.16, 1.07 to 1.26; p<0.00001, I(2)=67%), use of coloured as opposed to blue or black ink (1.39, 1.16 to 1.67), use of stamped return envelopes as opposed to franked return envelopes (1.29, 1.18 to 1.42; p<0.00001, I(2)=72%), an assurance of confidentiality (1.33, 1.24 to 1.42) and first class outward mailing (1.12, 1.02 to 1.23). The odds of response were reduced when the questionnaire included questions of a sensitive nature (0.94, 0.88 to 1.00; p=0.51, I(2)=0%), when questionnaires began with the most general questions (0.80, 0.67 to 0.96), or when participants were offered the opportunity to opt out of the study (0.76, 0.65 to 0.89; p=0.46, I(2)=0%). AUTHORS'
conclusionsHealth researchers using postal questionnaires can increase response rates using the strategies shown to be effective in this systematic review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17443629What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.