SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007
Antibiotics for treating acute chest syndrome in people with sickle cell disease.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibiotics for treating acute chest syndrome in people with sickle cell disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Antibiotics for treating acute chest syndrome in people with sickle cell disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Inhaled nitric oxide for acute chest syndrome in people with sickle cell disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- Acute Chest Syndrome in Children with Sickle Cell Disease: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Current management of sickle cell anemia.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2013Article
- Adult Sickle Cell Disease: A Five-year Experience of Intensive Care Management in a University Hospital in Oman.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical presentation of acute chest syndrome is similar whether due to infectious or non-infectious causes, thus antibiotics are usually prescribed to treat all episodes. Many different bacteria have been implicated as causative agents of acute chest syndrome. There is no standardized approach to antibiotic therapy and treatment is likely to vary from country to country. Thus, there is a need to identify the efficacy and safety of different antibiotic treatment approaches for people with sickle cell disease suffering from acute chest syndrome.
objectivesTo determine whether an empirical antibiotic treatment approach (used either alone or in combination): (a) is effective in treating acute chest syndrome compared to placebo or standard treatment; (b) is safe in treating acute chest syndrome compared to placebo or standard treatment; (c) differs dependent on the regimen used in treating acute chest syndrome differ from each other with respect to efficacy and safety; and (d) varies between different age groups, regions or countries with respect to efficacy and safety. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register, which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearching of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We also searched the LILACS database (1982 to May 2006) and the website: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (May 2006). Date of most recent search of the Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: February 2007. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for published or unpublished randomised controlled trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Each author intended to independently extract data and assess trial quality by standard Cochrane Collaboration methodologies, but no eligible randomized controlled trials were identified. MAIN
resultsWe were unable to find any randomised controlled trials on antibiotic treatment approaches for acute chest syndrome in people with sickle cell disease. AUTHORS'
conclusionsWe were unable to identify randomised controlled trials on efficacy and safety of the antibiotic treatment approaches for people with sickle cell disease suffering from acute chest syndrome. Randomised controlled trials are needed to establish the optimum antibiotic treatment for this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.