Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17443613›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Antibiotics for treating acute chest syndrome in people with sickle cell disease.

A J Martí-Carvajal, L O Conterno, J M Knight-Madden

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Current management of sickle cell anemia.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

A J Martí-CarvajalUniversidad de Carabobo, Departamento de Salud Pública, Centro Colaborador Venezolano de la Red Iberoamericana de la Colaboración Cochrane, Valencia, Edo. Carabobo, Venezuela, 2001. amarti@uc.edu.ve
L O Conterno
J M Knight-Madden
Faculdade de Medicina de Marília · BRResearch Institute for Tropical Medicine · PHUniversidad UTE · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical presentation of acute chest syndrome is similar whether due to infectious or non-infectious causes, thus antibiotics are usually prescribed to treat all episodes. Many different bacteria have been implicated as causative agents of acute chest syndrome. There is no standardized approach to antibiotic therapy and treatment is likely to vary from country to country. Thus, there is a need to identify the efficacy and safety of different antibiotic treatment approaches for people with sickle cell disease suffering from acute chest syndrome.

objectivesTo determine whether an empirical antibiotic treatment approach (used either alone or in combination): (a) is effective in treating acute chest syndrome compared to placebo or standard treatment; (b) is safe in treating acute chest syndrome compared to placebo or standard treatment; (c) differs dependent on the regimen used in treating acute chest syndrome differ from each other with respect to efficacy and safety; and (d) varies between different age groups, regions or countries with respect to efficacy and safety. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register, which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearching of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We also searched the LILACS database (1982 to May 2006) and the website: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (May 2006). Date of most recent search of the Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: February 2007. SELECTION CRITERIA: We searched for published or unpublished randomised controlled trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Each author intended to independently extract data and assess trial quality by standard Cochrane Collaboration methodologies, but no eligible randomized controlled trials were identified. MAIN

resultsWe were unable to find any randomised controlled trials on antibiotic treatment approaches for acute chest syndrome in people with sickle cell disease. AUTHORS'

conclusionsWe were unable to identify randomised controlled trials on efficacy and safety of the antibiotic treatment approaches for people with sickle cell disease suffering from acute chest syndrome. Randomised controlled trials are needed to establish the optimum antibiotic treatment for this condition.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellAnti-Bacterial AgentsCoughFeverHumansHypoxiaRespiration DisordersSputumSyndromeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID17443613
OpenAlexW4241144839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.