SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007
Lamotrigine for acute and chronic pain.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lamotrigine for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Non-antiepileptic drugs for trigeminal neuralgia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Interventions for treating pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Neuromodulators for pain management in rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Lamotrigine for acute and chronic pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Carbamazepine for acute and chronic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A Comprehensive Review of Trigeminal Neuralgia.Current pain and headache reports · 2019Review
- Postoperative Pain Management after Impacted Third Molar Surgery with Preoperative Oral Lamotrigine, a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2018Article
- Article
- Update on neuropathic pain treatment for trigeminal neuralgia. The pharmacological and surgical options.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2015Review
- Refractory trigeminal neuralgia. Non-surgical treatment options.CNS drugs · 2013Review
- Gynecologic management of neuropathic pain.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2011Review
- Trigeminal Neuralgia - A Debilitating Facial Pain.Reviews in pain · 2011Article
- Treatment options in trigeminal neuralgia.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2010Article
- Psychiatric issues in chronic pain.Current psychiatry reports · 2009Review
- [Symptoms and pathophysiological mechanisms of neuropathic pain syndromes].Der Nervenarzt · 2009Review
- Use of lidocaine patches for neuropathic pain in a comprehensive cancer centre.Pain research & managementArticle
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnticonvulsant medicines have a place in the treatment of neuropathic pain (pain due to nerve damage). This review looks at the evidence for the pain relieving properties of lamotrigine.
objectivesTo assess the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of the anticonvulsant lamotrigine for acute and chronic pain. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) of lamotrigine (and key brand names Lamictal, Lamictin, Neurium) in acute, chronic or cancer pain were identified from MEDLINE (1966 to August 2006), EMBASE 1994 to August 2006 and the CENTRAL register on The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2006). Additional reports were sought from the reference list of the retrieved papers. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs investigating the use of lamotrigine (any dose and by any route) for treatment of acute or chronic pain. Assessment of pain intensity or pain relief, or both, using validated scales. Participants were adults aged 18 and over. Only full journal publication articles were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Dichotomous data were used to calculate relative risk with 95% confidence intervals using a fixed effects model unless significant statistical heterogeneity was found. Continuous data was also reported where available. Meta-analysis was undertaken using a fixed effect model unless significant heterogeneity was present (I(2) >50%) in which case a random effects model was used. Numbers-needed-to-treat (NNTs) were calculated as the reciprocal of the absolute risk reduction. For unwanted effects, the NNT becomes the number-needed-to-harm (NNH) and was calculated. MAIN
resultsSixteen studies were identified. Nine studies were excluded. No studies for acute pain were identified. The seven included studies involved 502 participants, all for neuropathic pain. The studies covered the following conditions: central post stroke pain (1), diabetic neuropathy (1), HIV related neuropathy (2), intractable neuropathic pain (1), spinal cord injury related pain (1) and trigeminal neuralgia (1). The studies included participants in the age range of 26 to 77 years. Only one study for HIV related neuropathy had a statistically significant result for a sub group of patients on anti-retroviral therapy; this result is unlikely to be clinically significant NNT 4.3 (95% CI 2.3 to 37). Approximately 7% of participants taking lamotrigine reported a skin rash. AUTHORS'
conclusionsGiven the availability of more effective treatments including anticonvulsants and antidepressant medicines, lamotrigine does not have a significant place in therapy at present. The limited evidence currently available suggests that lamotrigine is unlikely to be of benefit for the treatment of neuropathic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.