Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17443611›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Lamotrigine for acute and chronic pain.

P J Wiffen, J Rees

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Lamotrigine for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Non-antiepileptic drugs for trigeminal neuralgia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Neuromodulators for pain management in rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. Lamotrigine for acute and chronic pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  6. Carbamazepine for acute and chronic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. A Comprehensive Review of Trigeminal Neuralgia.Current pain and headache reports · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Gynecologic management of neuropathic pain.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2011
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Treatment options in trigeminal neuralgia.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2010
    Article
  16. Psychiatric issues in chronic pain.Current psychiatry reports · 2009
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P J WiffenChurchill Hospital, Pain Research Unit, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, UK, OX3 7LJ. phil.wiffen@pru.ox.ac.uk
J Rees
Cochrane · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnticonvulsant medicines have a place in the treatment of neuropathic pain (pain due to nerve damage). This review looks at the evidence for the pain relieving properties of lamotrigine.

objectivesTo assess the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of the anticonvulsant lamotrigine for acute and chronic pain. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) of lamotrigine (and key brand names Lamictal, Lamictin, Neurium) in acute, chronic or cancer pain were identified from MEDLINE (1966 to August 2006), EMBASE 1994 to August 2006 and the CENTRAL register on The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2006). Additional reports were sought from the reference list of the retrieved papers. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs investigating the use of lamotrigine (any dose and by any route) for treatment of acute or chronic pain. Assessment of pain intensity or pain relief, or both, using validated scales. Participants were adults aged 18 and over. Only full journal publication articles were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Dichotomous data were used to calculate relative risk with 95% confidence intervals using a fixed effects model unless significant statistical heterogeneity was found. Continuous data was also reported where available. Meta-analysis was undertaken using a fixed effect model unless significant heterogeneity was present (I(2) >50%) in which case a random effects model was used. Numbers-needed-to-treat (NNTs) were calculated as the reciprocal of the absolute risk reduction. For unwanted effects, the NNT becomes the number-needed-to-harm (NNH) and was calculated. MAIN

resultsSixteen studies were identified. Nine studies were excluded. No studies for acute pain were identified. The seven included studies involved 502 participants, all for neuropathic pain. The studies covered the following conditions: central post stroke pain (1), diabetic neuropathy (1), HIV related neuropathy (2), intractable neuropathic pain (1), spinal cord injury related pain (1) and trigeminal neuralgia (1). The studies included participants in the age range of 26 to 77 years. Only one study for HIV related neuropathy had a statistically significant result for a sub group of patients on anti-retroviral therapy; this result is unlikely to be clinically significant NNT 4.3 (95% CI 2.3 to 37). Approximately 7% of participants taking lamotrigine reported a skin rash. AUTHORS'

conclusionsGiven the availability of more effective treatments including anticonvulsants and antidepressant medicines, lamotrigine does not have a significant place in therapy at present. The limited evidence currently available suggests that lamotrigine is unlikely to be of benefit for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAnalgesicsAnticonvulsantsChronic DiseaseHumansLamotriginePainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTriazinesAnalgesicsAnticonvulsantsLamotrigineTriazines

Identifiers

PMID17443611
OpenAlexW4235626465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.