SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007
Ovarian stimulation protocols (anti-oestrogens, gonadotrophins with and without GnRH agonists/antagonists) for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in women with subfertility.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Agents for ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in ovulatory women with infertility.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Assisted reproductive technologies for male subfertility.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non-tubal infertility.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Trial
- Effect of GnRH antagonists on clinical pregnancy rates in ovulation induction protocols with gonadotropins and intrauterine insemination.Singapore medical journal · 2015Trial
- Minimal Dose Paradigm in IUI Stimulation for Unexplained Infertility: Letrozole-Initiated Late Gonadotropin Protocol.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Changing sperm donors-a shortcut to pregnancy or just a myth?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Predicting success of intrauterine insemination using a clinically based scoring system.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022Article
- The Effect of the Time Interval From Sperm Processing to Intrauterine Insemination on the Pregnancy Outcomes of Infertile Women.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2022Article
- Clomiphene Citrate versus Recombinant FSH in intrauterine insemination cycles with mono- or bi-follicular development.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2021Article
- Clinical Application of AMH Measurement in Assisted Reproduction.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Review
- Strong Evidences of the Ovarian Carcinoma Risk in Women after IVF Treatment: A Review Article.Iranian journal of public health · 2019Review
- Intrauterine Insemination: Fundamentals Revisited.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2017Article
- Effect of Gonadotropin Types and Indications on Homologous Intrauterine Insemination Success: A Study from 1251 Cycles and a Review of the Literature.BioMed research international · 2017Review
- Gonadotropin Alone is a Better Drug for Ovarian Stimulation than in Combination with Clomiphene in Intrauterine Insemination.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2016Article
- Evaluation of Role of GnRH Antagonist in Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) Cycles with Mild Ovarian Hyperstimulation (MOH): A Prospective Randomised Study.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2016Article
- Fertility Treatments in the United States: Improving Access and Outcomes.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2016Article
- Luteal phase support in intrauterine insemination cycles.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2016Review
- A step-wise approach to sperm retrieval in men with neurogenic anejaculation.Nature reviews. Urology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntrauterine insemination (IUI) combined with ovarian hyperstimulation (OH) has been demonstrated to be an effective form of treatment for subfertile couples. Several ovarian stimulation protocols combined with IUI have been proposed, but it is still not clear which stimulation protocol and which dose is the most cost-effective.
objectivesTo evaluate ovarian stimulation protocols for intrauterine insemination for all indications. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched for all publications which described randomised controlled trials comparing different ovarian stimulation protocols followed by IUI. We searched the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's Central register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). We searched the electronic databases of MEDLINE (January 1966 to present) and EMBASE (1980 to present). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials only were considered for inclusion in this review. Trials comparing different ovarian stimulation protocols combined with IUI were selected and reviewed in detail. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent review authors independently assess trial quality and extracted data. MAIN
resultsForty three trials involving 3957 women were included. There were 11 comparisons in this review. Pregnancy rates are reported here since results of live birth rates were lacking. Seven studies (n = 556) were pooled comparing gonadotrophins with anti-oestrogens showing significant higher pregnancy rates with gonadotrophins (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.7). Five studies (n = 313) compared anti-oestrogens with aromatase inhibitors reporting no significant difference (OR 1.2 95% CI 0.64 to 2.1). The same could be concluded comparing different types of gonadotrophins (9 studies included, n = 576). Four studies (n = 391) reported the effect of adding a GnRH agonist which did not improve pregnancy rates (OR 0.98 95% CI 0.6 to 1.6), although it resulted in significant higher multiple pregnancy rates (OR 2.9 95% CI 1.0 to 8). Data of three studies (n = 299) showed no convincing evidence of adding a GnRH antagonist to gonadotrophins (OR 1.5 95% CI 0.83 to 2.8). The results of two studies (n = 297) reported no evidence of benefit in doubling the dose of gonadotrophins (OR 1.2 95% 0.67 to 1.9) although the multiple pregnancy rates and OHSS rates were increased. For the remaining five comparisons only one or none studies were included. AUTHORS'
conclusionsRobust evidence is lacking but based on the available results gonadotrophins might be the most effective drugs when IUI is combined with ovarian hyperstimulation. When gonadotrophins are applied it might be done on a daily basis. When gonadotrophins are used for ovarian stimulation low dose protocols are advised since pregnancy rates do not differ from pregnancy rates which result from high dose regimen, whereas the chances to encounter negative effects from ovarian stimulation such as multiples and OHSS are limited with low dose gonadotrophins. Further research is needed for each comparison made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.