Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17443578›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Interventions for preventing venous thromboembolism in adults undergoing knee arthroscopy.

J Ramos, C Perrotta, G Badariotti, G Berenstein

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Meta-analysis and suggested guidelines for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in foot and ankle surgery.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Diet as prophylaxis and treatment for venous thromboembolism?Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2010
    Review
  8. [Perioperative thromboprophylaxis in adults].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2009
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J RamosHospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Department of Orthopedics, Dorrego 1471, Victoria, Buenos Aires, Argentina, CP 1644. jorgeramosmd@yahoo.com
C Perrotta
G Badariotti
G Berenstein
Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires · ARHospital Posadas · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnee arthroscopy is a frequent surgical procedure. Arthroscopy procedures are considered minimally invasive. However, some patients will need extended surgical time, suffer injury and immobilization thus increasing the risk for thromboembolic events. Incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy is reported to be from 0.6% to 17.9% depending on the diagnostic method used. Different approaches are available for thromboprophylaxis (mechanical or pharmacological).

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of thromboprophylaxis to reduce the incidence of DVT in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Specialized Register (last searched October 2006) the CENTRAL (last searched Issue 4, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to 2006), EMBASE (1980 to 2006), and Lilacs (1988 to 2006). We contacted specialists known to be involved in phlebology and interested in post thrombotic syndrome for details of unpublished and ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs), whether blinded or not (i.e. double blinded, single blinded or unblinded) of all type of interventions, whether mechanical or pharmacological, single or in combination, used to prevent DVT in males and females over 18 years old undergoing knee arthroscopy. There was no restriction on language. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN

resultsFour trials involving 527 predominantly male participants were included. The main weakness of the studies was the lack of correct stratification of the arthroscopic intervention. The relative risk (RR) of thrombotic events was 0.20 (95% confidence interval (CI); 0.07 to 0.57) comparing any type of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus placebo. All thrombotic events but one (pulmonary embolism in the LMWH group) were distal venous thrombosis. Adverse events were most common in the intervention group than in the control group, RR 2.11 (95% CI 1.26 to 3.55). There were 66 episodes of adverse events. The number needed to harm was 20 for any adverse events. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThis meta-analysis suggests that LMWH reduces the incidence of distal DVT diagnosed by sonogram. The clinical benefit of this is uncertain. No strong evidence was found to conclude thromboprophylaxis is effective to prevent thromboembolic events and safe, in people with unknown risk factors for thrombosis, undergoing knee arthroscopy.

Indexed as

AdultAnticoagulantsArthroscopyHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansKnee JointRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStockings, CompressionVenous ThrombosisAnticoagulantsHeparin, Low-Molecular-Weight

Identifiers

PMID17443578
OpenAlexW4246201333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.