Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17443568›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Interventions for pityriasis rosea.

A A T Chuh, B L Dofitas, G G Comisel, L Reveiz, V Sharma, S E Garner, F Chu

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for pityriasis rosea.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [Paraviral exanthems].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2017
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Dermatology for the allergist.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2010
    Article
  10. [Pityriasis rosea in myocarditis].Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983) · 2010
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

A A T ChuhChinese University of Hong Kong, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Shop B5, Ning Yeung Terrace, 78 Bonham Road, Ground Floor, The Mid-Levels,Hong Kong, Hong Kong. achuh@iohk.com
B L Dofitas
G G Comisel
L Reveiz
V Sharma
S E Garner
F Chu
Children's Mercy Hospital · USChinese University of Hong Kong · CNCochrane · GBNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence · GBSt. Luke's Medical Center · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPityriasis rosea is a scaly rash that mainly affects young adults. It can be very itchy but most people recover within 2 to 12 weeks.

objectivesTo assess the effects of interventions for pityriasis rosea. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register (December 2004), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials in The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2005), EMBASE (1976 to January 2005), LILACS (1982 to January 2005), BIOSIS Preview (1980 to June 2002), and ongoing trials databases. We scanned bibliographies of published studies, abstracts from dermatology conference proceedings, corresponded with trialists and contacted the pharmaceutical industry. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials evaluating interventions for pityriasis rosea. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors to retrieve missing data. MAIN

resultsThree trials involving 148 people were included. One poor quality trial (23 people), compared intravenous glycyrrhizin and intravenous procaine. It found no significant difference between the two interventions for treating symptoms and rash. One fair quality trial (85 people), compared the oral antihistamine dexchlorpheniramine (4 mg), the oral steroid betamethasone (500 mcg), and a combination of betamethasone (250 mcg) and dexchlorpheniramine (2 mg). It found no significant difference in itch resolution at two weeks, as rated by the participants, between dexchlorpheniramine and betamethasone, and the combination of dexchlorpheniramine and betamethasone. However, both dexchlorpheniramine and betamethasone alone seem to be better at clearing rash than the combination of dexchlorpheniramine and betamethasone. These interventions were not compared with placebo. The small good quality trial (40 people) that compared oral erythromycin and placebo found that erythromycin was more effective than placebo in terms of rash improvement, as rated by the trialists, after two weeks (RR 13.00; 95% CI 1.91 to 88.64). It was also more effective in decreasing the itch score (difference of 3.95 points, 95% CI 3.37 to 4.53). No serious adverse effects were reported for the interventions. Two out of 17 people on oral erythromycin and 1 out of 17 on placebo reported minor gastrointestinal upset. AUTHORS'

conclusionsWe found inadequate evidence for efficacy for most treatments for pityriasis rosea. Oral erythromycin may be effective in treating the rash and decreasing the itch. However, this result should be treated with caution since it comes from only one small RCT. More research is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of erythromycin and other treatments.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Infective AgentsErythromycinFemaleGlycyrrhizic AcidHistamine H1 AntagonistsHumansMalePityriasis RoseaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Infective AgentsErythromycinGlycyrrhizic AcidHistamine H1 Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID17443568
OpenAlexW1856584834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.