Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17443562›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Preoperative bathing or showering with skin antiseptics to prevent surgical site infection.

J Webster, S Osborne

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. No Clear Benefit of Chlorhexidine Use at Home Before Surgical Preparation.The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · 2018
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prosthetic joint infection.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2014
    Review
  9. Periprosthetic knee infection: ten strategies that work.Knee surgery & related research · 2013
    Review
  10. [Prevention of periprosthetic joint infections].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2012
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Back to basics--cutting the cord on umbilical infections.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. [A comparative in vitro study of cell toxicity of clinically used antiseptics].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2009
    Article
  20. Reducing surgical site infections: a review.Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J WebsterRoyal Brisbane and Royal Women's Hospital, Centre for Clinical Nursing, Level 2, Building 34, Butterfield Street, Herston, QLD, Australia, 4029. joan_webster@health.qld.gov.au
S Osborne
Queensland University of Technology · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical site infections (SSIs) are wound infections that occur after invasive (surgical) procedures. Preoperative bathing or showering with an antiseptic skin wash product is a well-accepted procedure for reducing skin bacteria (microflora). It is less clear whether reducing skin microflora leads to a lower incidence of surgical site infection.

objectivesTo review the evidence for preoperative bathing or showering with antiseptics for the prevention of hospital-acquired (nosocomial) surgical site infection. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (December 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2005), MEDLINE (January 1966 to December 2005) and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing any antiseptic preparation used for preoperative full-body bathing or showering with non-antiseptic preparations in patients undergoing surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed studies for selection, trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN

resultsSix trials involving a total of 10,007 participants were included. Three of the included trials had three comparison groups. The antiseptic used in all trials was 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (Hibiscrub). Three trials involving 7691 participants compared chlorhexidine with a placebo. Bathing with chlorhexidine compared with a placebo did not result in a statistically significant reduction in SSIs; the relative risk of SSI (RR) was 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 1.04). When only trials of high quality were included in this comparison, the RR of SSI was 0.95 (95%CI 0.82 to 1.10). Three trials of 1443 participants compared bar soap with chlorhexidine; when combined there was no difference in the risk of SSIs (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.84). Two trials of 1092 patients compared bathing with chlorhexidine with no washing, one large study found a statistically significant difference in favour of bathing with chlorhexidine (RR 0.36, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.79). The second smaller study found no difference between patients who washed with chlorhexidine and those who did not wash preoperatively. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThis review provides no clear evidence of benefit for preoperative showering or bathing with chlorhexidine over other wash products, to reduce surgical site infection. Efforts to reduce the incidence of nosocomial surgical site infection should focus on interventions where effect has been demonstrated.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalBathsChlorhexidineDisinfectionFemaleHumansMalePreoperative CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSoapsSurgical Wound InfectionAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineSoaps

Identifiers

PMID17443562
OpenAlexW4300610182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.