Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17443510›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2007

Skin grafting for venous leg ulcers.

J E Jones, E A Nelson

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hydrogel dressings for venous leg ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic wounds.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Venous ulcers of the lower limb: Where do we stand?Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2012
    Article
  9. Venous ulcer review.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2011
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J E Jones
E A Nelson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVenous leg ulceration is a recurrent, chronic, disabling condition. It affects up to one in 100 adults at some time. Standard treatments are simple dressings and compression bandages or stockings. Sometimes, despite treatment, ulcers remain open for months or years. Sometimes skin grafts are used to stimulate healing. These may be taken, or grown into a dressing, from the patient's own uninjured skin (autografts), or applied as a sheet of bioengineered skin grown from donor cells (allograft). Preserved skin from other animals, such as pigs, has also been used (xenografts).

objectivesTo assess the effect of skin grafts for treating venous leg ulcers. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (February 2006) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2006). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of skin grafts in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently undertook data extraction and assessment of study quality. MAIN

resultsWe identified 15 trials - generally of poor methodological quality - involving 768 participants. In 11 trials participants also received compression bandaging. One trial (31 participants) compared a dressing with an autograft. Three trials (74 participants) compared frozen allografts with dressings, and three trials (47 participants) compared fresh allografts with dressings. Two trials (345 participants) compared tissue-engineered skin (bilayer artificial skin) with a dressing. In two trials (71 participants) a single-layer dermal replacement was compared with standard care. Four trials compared skin grafting techniques: one trial (92 participants) compared autografts with frozen allograft, a second (51 participants) compared a pinch graft (autograft) with a porcine dermis (xenograft), the third (seven participants, 12 ulcers) compared tissue-engineered skin with a split-thickness graft, the fourth (10 participants) compared a fresh allograft with a frozen allograft. The trials comparing bilayer artificial skin with a dressing reported a significantly higher proportion of ulcers healing with artificial skin. There was not enough evidence from the other trials to determine whether other types of skin grafting increased the healing of venous ulcers. AUTHORS'

conclusionsBilayer artificial skin, used in conjunction with compression bandaging, increases the chance of healing a venous ulcer compared with compression and a simple dressing. Further research is needed to assess whether other forms of skin grafts increase ulcer healing.

Indexed as

Skin TransplantationAdultHumansLeg UlcerOcclusive DressingsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTransplantation, Autologous

Identifiers

PMID17443510
OpenAlexW4254900528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.