Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17443362›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2007

Why do general practitioners decline training to improve management of medically unexplained symptoms?

Peter Salmon, Sarah Peters, Rebecca Clifford, Wendy Iredale, Linda Gask, Anne Rogers, Christopher Dowrick, John Hughes, Richard Morriss

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02444520 (Persistent Physical Symptoms Reduction Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02444520 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Persistent Physical Symptoms Reduction Intervention: a Systems Change and Evaluation (PRINCE) - Integrated GP Care for Persistent Physical Symptoms: a Feasibility & Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing's College LondonRan2015 to 2018Enrolled161ConditionsPersistent Physical SymptomsArmsIntegrated GP Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Open Trial of Integrated Primary Care Consultation for Medically Unexplained Symptoms.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2017
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ten Vestibular Tools for Primary Care.Frontiers in neurology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Peter SalmonDivision of Clinical Psychology, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, UK. psalmon@liv.ac.uk
Sarah Peters
Rebecca Clifford
Wendy Iredale
Linda Gask
Anne Rogers
Christopher Dowrick
John Hughes
Richard Morriss
University of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GBRoyal Liverpool University Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0100809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practitioners' (GPs) communication with patients presenting medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) has the potential to somatize patients' problems and intensify dependence on medical care. Several reports indicate that GPs have negative attitudes about patients with MUS. If these attitudes deter participation in training or other methods to improve communication, practitioners who most need help will not receive it.

objectiveTo identify how GPs' attitudes to patients with MUS might inhibit their participation with training to improve management.

designQualitative study.

participantsGPs (N = 33) who had declined or accepted training in reattribution techniques in the context of a research trial. APPROACH: GPs were interviewed and their accounts analysed qualitatively.

resultsAlthough attitudes that devalued patients with MUS were common in practitioners who had declined training, these coexisted, in the same practitioners, with evidence of intuitive and elaborate psychological work with these patients. However, these practitioners devalued their psychological skills. GPs who had accepted training also described working psychologically with MUS but devalued neither patients with MUS nor their own psychological skills.

conclusionsGPs' attitudes that suggested disengagement from patients with MUS belied their pursuit of psychological objectives. We therefore suggest that, whereas negative attitudes to patients have previously been regarded as the main barrier to involvement in measures to improve patient management, GPs devaluing of their own psychological skills with these patients may be more important.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelFamily PracticeEducation, Medical, ContinuingFemaleHumansMalePhysician-Patient RelationsPhysicians, FamilySomatoform Disorders

Identifiers

PMID17443362
PMCPMC1855690
OpenAlexW2152186335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.