Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17443248›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2007

Using the Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) database: how do clinicians really search?

Emma Meats, Jon Brassey, Carl Heneghan, Paul Glasziou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. The yield and usefulness of PAINArchives of physiotherapy · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. An analysis of clinical queries in an electronic health record search utility.International journal of medical informatics · 2010
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Evidence-based Medicine Search: a customizable federated search engine.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma MeatsDepartment of Primary Health Care, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, Rosemary Rue Building, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom. emma.meats@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
Jon Brassey
Carl Heneghan
Paul Glasziou

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesClinicians and patients are increasingly accessing information through Internet searches. This study aimed to examine clinicians' current search behavior when using the Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) database to examine search engine use and the ways it might be improved.

methodsA Web log analysis was undertaken of the TRIP database-a meta-search engine covering 150 health resources including MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, and a variety of guidelines. The connectors for terms used in searches were studied, and observations were made of 9 users' search behavior when working with the TRIP database.

resultsOf 620,735 searches, most used a single term, and 12% (n = 75,947) used a Boolean operator: 11% (n = 69,006) used "AND" and 0.8% (n = 4,941) used "OR." Of the elements of a well-structured clinical question (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome), the population was most commonly used, while fewer searches included the intervention. Comparator and outcome were rarely used. Participants in the observational study were interested in learning how to formulate better searches.

conclusionsWeb log analysis showed most searches used a single term and no Boolean operators. Observational study revealed users were interested in conducting efficient searches but did not always know how. Therefore, either better training or better search interfaces are required to assist users and enable more effective searching.

Indexed as

Databases as TopicInternetAbstracting and IndexingHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID17443248
PMCPMC1852632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.