Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17442307›Full record

ArticleExperimental parasitology2007

Brugia malayi: comparison of protective immune responses induced by Bm-alt-2 DNA, recombinant Bm-ALT-2 protein and prime-boost vaccine regimens in a jird model.

Sivasakthivel Thirugnanam, Pandurangan Pandiaraja, Kalyanasundaram Ramaswamy, Vadivel Murugan, Munirathinam Gnanasekar, Krithika Nandakumar, Maryada Venkata Rami Reddy, Perumal Kaliraj

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental parasitology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Dose-Dependent Prophylactic Efficacy of Filarial Antigens Glutathione-S-Transferase and Abundant Larval Transcript-2 againstThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Immunological evaluation of fusion protein ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sivasakthivel ThirugnanamCentre for Biotechnology, Anna University, Chennai 600 025, India.
Pandurangan Pandiaraja
Kalyanasundaram Ramaswamy
Vadivel Murugan
Munirathinam Gnanasekar
Krithika Nandakumar
Maryada Venkata Rami Reddy
Perumal Kaliraj
Anna University, Chennai · INMahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences · INIllinois College · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

MULTIVALENT VACCINE FOR LYMPHATIC FILARIASISR01AI064745 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KALYANASUNDARAM, RAMASWAMY · 2007 to 2010
$1.5M
MULTIVALENT VACCINE FOR LYMPHATIC FILARIASISR56AI064745 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KALYANASUNDARAM, RAMASWAMY · 2006 to 2006
$310k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI064745NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI064745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunization of jirds with Bm-alt-2 elicited partial protection against challenge infection with the filarial parasite Brugia malayi. In this study, we initially compared the protective immune responses elicited following immunization with recombinant Bm-ALT-2 protein regimen and Bm-alt-2 DNA regimen. These studies showed that protein vaccination conferred approximately 75% protection compared to DNA vaccination that conferred only 57% protection. Analysis of the protective immune responses showed that the protein immunization promoted a Th2-biased response with an increase in IL-4, IL-5 and IgG1 responses, whereas, the DNA vaccine promoted a Th1-biased response with profound IFN-gamma and IgG2a responses. Since protein vaccination gave better results than DNA vaccination, we then wanted to evaluate whether a prime-boost vaccination that combined DNA prime and protein boost will significantly increase the protective responses induced by the protein vaccine. Our results suggest that prime-boost vaccination had no added advantage and was comparatively less effective (64% protection) than the Bm-ALT-2 protein alone vaccination. Prime boost vaccination generated mixed Th1/Th2 responses with a slightly diminished Th2 responses compared to protein vaccination. Thus, our results suggest that Bm-ALT-2 protein vaccination regimen may be slightly better than prime-boost vaccine regimen and the mechanism of protection appears to be largely mediated by a Th2-biased response.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthBrugia malayiCytokinesDiffusion Chambers, CultureDisease Models, AnimalDNA, HelminthElephantiasis, FilarialGerbillinaeHelminth ProteinsImmunity, CellularImmunizationLymphocyte ActivationMaleRecombinant ProteinsALT-2 protein, Brugia malayiAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthCytokinesDNA, HelminthHelminth ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsVaccinesVaccines, DNAVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID17442307
PMCPMC2763209
OpenAlexW2064688121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.