Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17440822›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2007

A novel study investigating the therapeutic outcome of patients with lytic, mixed and sclerotic bone metastases treated with combined radiotherapy and ibandronate.

Vassilios Vassiliou, Christine Kalogeropoulou, Efstathia Giannopoulou, Michael Leotsinidis, Irine Tsota, Dimitrios Kardamakis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Pain outcomes in patients with bone metastases from advanced cancer: assessment and management with bone-targeting agents.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Patient-reported outcome instruments used to assess pain and functioning in studies of bisphosphonate treatment for bone metastases.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Impact of skeletal complications on patients' quality of life, mobility, and functional independence.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2008
    Review
  15. Advances in radiation therapy for oncologic pain.Current pain and headache reports · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vassilios VassiliouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Patras Medical School, Athinon 81, 264 41, Patras, Greece.
Christine Kalogeropoulou
Efstathia Giannopoulou
Michael Leotsinidis
Irine Tsota
Dimitrios Kardamakis
University of Patras · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the therapeutic response of patients with different types of bone metastases treated with combined radiotherapy and bisphosphonates. PATIENTS AND

methodsBy using computed tomography 52 patients were grouped into groups of lytic, mixed and sclerotic bone lesions. All patients were treated with concomitant radiotherapy and ibandronate (10 monthly cycles) and underwent clinical and radiological evaluations prior to therapy and at 3, 6 and 10 months of follow up.

resultsAt baseline there were statistically significant differences between the three groups for all the evaluated parameters. From 3 months onwards differences were leveled out. Statistically significant improvements were noted at all time points of evaluation for all groups in parameters such as pain (0-10), quality of life (QOL-physical functioning, 0-100) and Karnofsky performance status (KPS). The average pain score for the lytic group was reduced from 8.1 to 1.5 points at 3 months. The corresponding reductions for the mixed and sclerotic groups were from 6.2 to 0.5 and from 4.4 to 0.3 points respectively. Complete pain responses were >76.4% at all time points for all groups. Opioid consumption was also markedly reduced. Overall, the highest clinical response was noted for the lytic group, even though the mean values of pain, QOL and KPS were worse than those of the two other groups at all time points (apart from pain score at 10 months). The percentage of patients of the lytic group experiencing a complete pain response was the least of the three groups during follow up. At 10 months bone density was almost tripled for the lytic and almost doubled for the mixed group.

conclusionsEven though the therapeutic outcome for the three groups was similar, the degree of clinical response and reossification differed.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidBone DensityBone NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDiphosphonatesFemaleHumansIbandronic AcidMaleMiddle AgedPainQuality of LifeAnalgesics, OpioidDiphosphonatesIbandronic Acid

Identifiers

PMID17440822
OpenAlexW2032489540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.